We report here the potential competency of MnCO 3 versus MnO 2 for supercapacitor applications. MnCO 3 was synthesized by a hydrothermal method using KMnO 4 as a manganese source and either sugar or pyrrole as carbon source. MnCO 3 synthesized using sugar and pyrrole as carbon source is referred hereafter as MnCO 3 (s) and MnCO 3 (p), respectively. The synthesized products were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopic and transmission electron microscopic studies. Microscopic studies revealed that MnO 2 possesses micro-flower-like morphology constructed by self-assembled nano-petals. While the morphology of MnCO 3 (s) is sub-micron size particles of different shape, the morphology of MnCO 3 (p) is crystalline particles of 10-20 nm dia. The capacitive characteristics of MnO 2 , MnCO 3 (s) and MnCO 3 (p) were evaluated in aqueous 0.1 M Mg(ClO 4 ) 2 electrolyte between 0 and 1 V using cyclic voltammetry and galvanostatic charge/discharge cycling. Specific capacitance (SC) values of 216 and 296 F g −1 obtained for MnCO 3 (s) and MnCO 3 (p) are 35 and 85 % higher than SC value of 160 F g −1 obtained for MnO 2 , respectively. Besides better capacitive storage characteristics, MnCO 3 (s) and MnCO 3 (p) have also exhibited better rate capability and cycle life than MnO 2 .