2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-017-3558-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MJO simulation in CMIP5 climate models: MJO skill metrics and process-oriented diagnosis

Abstract: coherence between eastward propagation of precipitation/ convection and the wind field. The RHCP-metric, indicative of the sensitivity of simulated convection to low-level environmental moisture, and the NGMS-metric, indicative of the efficiency of a convective atmosphere for exporting moist static energy out of the column, show robust correlations with a large number of MJO skill metrics. The GEFmetric, indicative of the strength of the column-integrated longwave radiative heating due to cloud-radiation inter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
117
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
8
117
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is dimensionless. Most CMIP5 models underestimate MJO amplitude, especially when OLR is used in the evaluation, and exhibit too fast phase speed, while lacking coherence between eastward propagation of precipitation/convection and the wind field (Ahn et al ., ). We identified a small group of CMIP5 models which showed the highest skill along these two metrics and Table then identifies these seven models which were diagnosed with the most realistic MJO‐like features.…”
Section: Results From Cmip5 Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is dimensionless. Most CMIP5 models underestimate MJO amplitude, especially when OLR is used in the evaluation, and exhibit too fast phase speed, while lacking coherence between eastward propagation of precipitation/convection and the wind field (Ahn et al ., ). We identified a small group of CMIP5 models which showed the highest skill along these two metrics and Table then identifies these seven models which were diagnosed with the most realistic MJO‐like features.…”
Section: Results From Cmip5 Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While most CMIP5 models underestimate MJO amplitude and exhibit too fast phase speed while lacking coherence between eastward propagation of precipitation/convection and the wind field (Ahn et al ., ), our evaluation revealed a small group of CMIP5 models with above average skill along two MJO metrics (see Figures S1–S4). A separate analysis of these more skilful models reveals significant differences in projected changes of the monsoon metrics between the more skilful models and a similar size group of least skilful models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies showed that state-of-the-art climate models are capable of reproducing MJO's basic characteristics in intensity, spectrum, spatial structure and propagation as well as the relevant dynamics (e.g., Kim et al 2009Kim et al , 2014bHung et al 2013;Ahn et al 2017). However, it was also revealed by these studies that the skill of MJO simulation always varied from one model to another, and most models showed limitations in one or more aspects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in the case of TC seasonal forecasts, the first subseasonal forecasts of TC activity were statistical (Leroy & Wheeler, ), based on logistic regression of TC days with MJO and Indo‐Pacific SST indices, given that the dynamical models were not able to simulate well or forecast the MJO (Ahn et al, ; Kim et al, ). As the simulations the MJO in dynamical models improved they were able to reproduce the observed modulation of TCs (Vitart, ), as shown in Figure , which led to the development of the TCs subseasonal forecasts with skill similar to the statistical ones (Vitart et al, ).…”
Section: Sub‐seasonal To Seasonal (S2s) Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%