Abstract:Cassava processing wastewater (CPW) is a highly polluting, liquid residue of cassava processing, usually discarded or treated anaerobically. However, it can serve as a low-cost culture medium for microalgae. After a preliminary evaluation of the growth of 10 microalgal strains in diluted CPW, the microalgae Haematococcus pluvialis SAG 34−1b and Neochloris (Ettlia) oleoabundans UTEX 1185 were selected for cultivation in CPW without a supply of additional nutrients and evaluated for their growth, lipid productio… Show more
“…They rely on organic chemicals found in the media [52]. Sorgatto, Soccol, Molina-Aulestia, de Carvalho, de Melo Pereira, and de Carvalho [53] reported that microalgae grew faster in cassava wastewater and produced lipids similar to synthetic mixotrophic cultures. Another research by Nwanko and Agwa (2021) showed that the optimal ratio of cassava peel water to cassava wastewater (CP:CW) for growth was 160:40.…”
Section: Cassava Wastewater As a Substrate For Microalgaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over 99% of ammonia, nitrites, and nitrates, could be reduced. [ microalgae in wastewater [53,61]. Table 3 depicts the cassava wastewater treatment product based on microalgae.…”
Cassava is a good source of carbohydrates and a staple diet in many countries. It has a high-calorie count but a low protein and fat content. Microalgae biomass is increasingly being used in the food business industry due to its ease of production, low carbon requirements, and small footprint. The usage of microalgae in combination with cassava is becoming more common as it can boost the amount of nutrients in processed cassava products. In this chapter, we discuss the development of cassava products that combine cassava with microalgae. Furthermore, cassava waste contains carbohydrates, which can be used as a carbon source for the development of microalgae. Cassava starch, when modified to become cationic cassava starch, has the potential to be used as a flocculant agent for the separation of microalgal biomass. Cassava starch is also well-known for being a low-cost source of bioplastics. This chapter also addresses the possibilities for microalgae and cassava to be used as bioplastics in the same way.
“…They rely on organic chemicals found in the media [52]. Sorgatto, Soccol, Molina-Aulestia, de Carvalho, de Melo Pereira, and de Carvalho [53] reported that microalgae grew faster in cassava wastewater and produced lipids similar to synthetic mixotrophic cultures. Another research by Nwanko and Agwa (2021) showed that the optimal ratio of cassava peel water to cassava wastewater (CP:CW) for growth was 160:40.…”
Section: Cassava Wastewater As a Substrate For Microalgaementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over 99% of ammonia, nitrites, and nitrates, could be reduced. [ microalgae in wastewater [53,61]. Table 3 depicts the cassava wastewater treatment product based on microalgae.…”
Cassava is a good source of carbohydrates and a staple diet in many countries. It has a high-calorie count but a low protein and fat content. Microalgae biomass is increasingly being used in the food business industry due to its ease of production, low carbon requirements, and small footprint. The usage of microalgae in combination with cassava is becoming more common as it can boost the amount of nutrients in processed cassava products. In this chapter, we discuss the development of cassava products that combine cassava with microalgae. Furthermore, cassava waste contains carbohydrates, which can be used as a carbon source for the development of microalgae. Cassava starch, when modified to become cationic cassava starch, has the potential to be used as a flocculant agent for the separation of microalgal biomass. Cassava starch is also well-known for being a low-cost source of bioplastics. This chapter also addresses the possibilities for microalgae and cassava to be used as bioplastics in the same way.
“…Currently, processes such as filtration, flocculation, and sterilization are also being evaluated as pretreatment for this effluent. However, the most promising current research is using the anaerobic digestion of CPW [17,94]. After pretreatment, the effluent CPW (or its digestate) still contains high amounts of nitrogen, phosphate, and soluble sugars, thus allowing the mixotrophic or heterotrophic microalgae production for bioproducts, such as biomass, biodiesel, or pigments [95].…”
“…By providing nutrients at a meager cost, using residues can reduce expenses in algal production. This is advantageous for already established products, such as PC (phycocyanin, a blue-colored protein from cyanobacteria) and AX (astaxanthin, a carotenoid), and enables the production of new products, such as biofuels and PHAs (polyhydroxyalkanoates, biopolymers produced by some cyanobacteria) [16][17][18]. Some bottlenecks to the massive production of microalgal biomass, such as the low cell concentration in cultures and the consequent need for large cultivation areas and large volumes of culture media and nutrients, can be solved using agro-industry wastewaters.…”
Recycling bioresources is the only way to sustainably meet a growing world population’s food and energy needs. One of the ways to do so is by using agro-industry wastewater to cultivate microalgae. While the industrial production of microalgae requires large volumes of water, existing agro-industry processes generate large volumes of wastewater with eutrophicating nutrients and organic carbon that must be removed before recycling the water back into the environment. Coupling these two processes can benefit the flourishing microalgal industry, which requires water, and the agro-industry, which could gain extra revenue by converting a waste stream into a bioproduct. Microalgal biomass can be used to produce energy, nutritional biomass, and specialty products. However, there are challenges to establishing stable and circular processes, from microalgae selection and adaptation to pretreating and reclaiming energy from residues. This review discusses the potential of agro-industry residues for microalgal production, with a particular interest in the composition and the use of important primary (raw) and secondary (digestate) effluents generated in large volumes: sugarcane vinasse, palm oil mill effluent, cassava processing waster, abattoir wastewater, dairy processing wastewater, and aquaculture wastewater. It also overviews recent examples of microalgae production in residues and aspects of process integration and possible products, avoiding xenobiotics and heavy metal recycling. As virtually all agro-industries have boilers emitting CO2 that microalgae can use, and many industries could benefit from anaerobic digestion to reclaim energy from the effluents before microalgal cultivation, the use of gaseous effluents is also discussed in the text.
“…It was observed that the remediation setup with cassava starch introduced had the lowest water TPH concentration (223 mg/L) at the end of the experimental period. Sorgatto et al (2021) reported that cassava starch in solution helps in the growth of aquatic microscopic plants. These microscopic plants carry out phytoremediation, which lowers the water's TPH content, and reduces its biological oxygen demand and its chemical oxygen demand.…”
Section: Impact Of Remediating Therapy On the Water Tphmentioning
Environmental degradation resulting from petroleum spills had become a major menace in most petroleum rich regions of the world. The remediation potential of individual green materials and their combinations were quantified in this study. Stimulated petroleum spill water was remediated with water lettuce, activated charcoal, rice husks and their combinations, within an experimental period of 40 days. The total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) value of the contaminated water and remediated contaminated water was determined in accordance with American Public Health Association’s (APHA) approved procedures. Findings of this study depicted that the amendments used were able to reduce the TPH concentration of the contaminated water; with activated charcoal tending to have higher remediation efficiency than rice husk. The results revealed that the TPH concentration of the contaminated water treated with only water lettuce, declined from 3897 to 1296 mg/L; while the TPH value of contaminated water treated with water lettuce and activated charcoal (C2 and C3), dropped from 3897 to 535 mg/L and 382.33 mg/L respectively, depending on the charcoal quantity employed. It was also observed that the TPH of the contaminated water treated with water lettuce and rice husk (C4 and C5), dropped from 3897 to 864 mg/L and 680 mg/L respectively, depending on the quantity of rice husks used for the bioremediation program. Additionally, the study’s findings revealed that the TPH of the contaminated water remediated with the combination of water lettuce, charcoal, rice husk and cassava starch (C6 and C7) declined from 3897 to 392 mg/L and 223 mg/L respectively. The study’s findings had depicted that agricultural waste materials can be harnessed to remediate petroleum spill sites, and the remediation efficiency can be optimized through combined remediation methods/materials.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.