Mixing space: affinitive practice and the insurgent potential of food

Abstract

Abstract. Recent debate in human geography has challenged the problematic "alternative"/"conventional" duality that characterises contemporary food provision. Within this binary, alternative food networks and initiatives (AFIs and AFNs) are positioned in opposition to more conventional, agri-capitalist modes of food production and distribution. Framing food around materially, discursively and spatially distinct, albeit relational, geographies not only reinforces this binary but also reaffirms the hegemony of agri-capitalism that alternative provision seeks to undo. Focusing on examples of artisanal and industrial bread production in the UK and the USA, this paper challenges such ontological framings. Drawing from conceptual insights into diverse economies and alternative economic spaces (e.g. Gibson-Graham, 1996Lee and Leyshon, 2003) and adopting an integrative approach to practice (Shove and Pantzar, 2005;Hand and Shove, 2007), this paper examines the practices that constitute artisanal and industrial baking. Specifically, it focuses on the ways in which embodied practices constitute the spaces of production for such foods. While acknowledging the considerable distances between the geographies that circumscribe these alternative and conventional foods, this paper argues that practices of food production narrow these distances, thereby destabilising the alternative/conventional binary. The geographies of food may mobilise an array of places, materials and ideologies, which are suggestive of two opposing systems of food provision, but practices of food production reveal an array of marginal spaces that challenge this. By reorienting critical attention onto these marginal spaces, the differences between artisanal and conventional food become blurred -and the affinities produced through normalised discourses and materialities of food are contested, resisted and disrupted. I argue these spaces are insurgent and that they come together through affinitive practices, which result in the potential for radical change within food provision.

Searching for the “politics of the possible” in flexitarianism

“…The 100 mile diet can be 'read' as reproducing neoliberal subjectivities through, for example, its focus on the choices of individual consumers to 'vote with their dollar' by eating locally (within 100 miles) rather than buying from global supply chains and are inspired to make these choices by seeking out knowledge that enables normative assessments of local food as 'better' than global food. This reading of the 100 mile diet, and other localised, place-specific AFNs is judged by Harris to be unsatisfactory (see also Coles 2016). This is because when academics engage with neoliberal discourse, including critical analyses of neoliberalism, they enact and perpetuate that discourse seeing it in all that they investigate.…”

Points of convergence: Deploying the geographies of critical nexus-thinking

“…Elsewhere, Barua (2021: 1) argues that ‘some species have become cosmopolitan as infrastructure – containers, cargo, ships and railways – has moved them around the world’. Nexus-thinking can push this further by offering a lens through which to consider the ways in which distant sites and practices, such as those associated with agri- and supply-chain capitalism (see Coles, 2016; Tsing, 2009), facilitate flows and act as blockages that re/route material flows of resources, and in the process enrol new actors and agents as a result of their attempts to govern commodities. In the process, it highlights the ways in which such disruptions alter the scales and territories nominally constituted by given resources – extending them through the spatial and scalar logics of nexus.…”