Mixing methods within stated preference environmental valuation: choice experiments and post-questionnaire qualitative analysis

Powe, Neil A.; Garrod, Guy; McMahon, P. L.

doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.022

Cited by 45 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Utilizing postsurvey questionnaires, previous research suggests that survey respondents' believe that the money generated would actually be spent on the proposed project (Powe, Garrod, and McMahon 2005) and that the majority of respondents regard the CV results as something that is likely to be of use to policy makers (Brouwer et al 1999). However, produce results not in accord with a binding referendum (p = 1.0), but voting behavior associated with higher probability levels (p = 0.75) cannot be distinguished from that of a binding referendum.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Using Ex Ante Approaches to Obtain Credible Signals for Value in Contingent Markets: Evidence from the Field

Landry

List²

2007

American J Agri Economics

111

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

While contingent valuation remains the only option available for measurement of total economic value of nonmarketed goods, the method has been criticized due to its hypothetical nature. We analyze field experimental data to evaluate two ex ante approaches to attenuating hypothetical bias, directly comparing value statements across four distinct referenda: hypothetical, "cheap talk", "consequential", and real. Our empirical evidence suggests two major findings: hypothetical responses are significantly different from real responses; and responses in the consequential and cheap talk treatments are statistically indistinguishable from real responses. We review the potential for each method to produce reliable results in the field. Copyright 2007, Oxford University Press.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Using Ex Ante Approaches to Obtain Credible Signals for Value in Contingent Markets: Evidence from the Field

Landry

List²

2007

American J Agri Economics

111

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, choice experiments were only extended to the estimation of the impacts on economic welfare of altering the provision of public goods in the early 1990s (Viscusi et al, 1991;Opaluch et al, 1993;Adamowicz et al, 1994). Since then they have become increasingly popular given their flexibility (Bennett and Blamey, 2001;Farber et al, 2002;Powe et al, 2005).…”

Section: Choice Experiments Methodsmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…That is, the subset still enables the analysis of all alternatives to be made. make the necessary trade-offs (Powe et al, 2005). Consequently, limits need to be placed on the number of attributes that can be realistically examined in a survey format.…”

Section: Survey Instrument Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Economic value of conserving deep-sea corals in Irish waters: A choice experiment study on marine protected areas

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Factors for the conjoint analysis were identified through the focus group discussions. Focus groups have been combined with stated preference methods in several studies (Garrod and Willis ; Powe et al ; Christie et al ; Weber and Stewart ; Collins et al ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Why Aren't Advanced High–Strength Steels More Widely Used?: Stakeholder Preferences and Perceived Barriers to New Materials

Alriksson¹,

Henningsson²

2014

J of Industrial Ecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Advanced high‐strength steels may reduce the use of nonrenewable resources and energy given that the amount of material needed is smaller, compared to traditional steel grades. Still, advanced steel grades are not utilized to the extent that could be expected. This study examines stakeholders’ preferences of steel characteristics and perceived barriers to the introduction of new materials. Focus group interviews were used to identify steel characteristics and perceived barriers. Stakeholder preferences of steel characteristics were evaluated through a conjoint analysis; the results showed that low weight was given the highest priority, followed by high impact strength and low price. Low chromium content was the steel characteristic of least interest. Perceived barriers to the introduction of high‐strength steel were categorized as technical barriers, knowledge barriers, scrap management barriers, suitability barriers, and cost barriers.

show abstract

Mixing methods within stated preference environmental valuation: choice experiments and post-questionnaire qualitative analysis

Cited by 45 publications

References 35 publications

Using Ex Ante Approaches to Obtain Credible Signals for Value in Contingent Markets: Evidence from the Field

Using Ex Ante Approaches to Obtain Credible Signals for Value in Contingent Markets: Evidence from the Field

Economic value of conserving deep-sea corals in Irish waters: A choice experiment study on marine protected areas

Why Aren't Advanced High–Strength Steels More Widely Used?: Stakeholder Preferences and Perceived Barriers to New Materials

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About