Mixed treatment comparison of repeated measurements of a continuous endpoint: an example using topical treatments for primary open‐angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension

Abstract

Mixed treatment comparison (MTC) meta-analyses estimate relative treatment effects from networks of evidence while preserving randomisation. We extend the MTC framework to allow for repeated measurements of a continuous endpoint that varies over time. We used, as a case study, a systematic review and meta-analysis of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements from randomised controlled trials evaluating topical ocular hypotensives in primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension because IOP varies over the day and over the treatment course, and repeated measurements are frequently reported. We adopted models for conducting MTC in WinBUGS (The BUGS Project, Cambridge, UK) to allow for repeated IOP measurements and to impute missing standard deviations of the raw data using the predictive distribution from observations with standard deviations. A flexible model with an unconstrained baseline for IOP variations over time and time-invariant random treatment effects fitted the data well. We also adopted repeated measures models to allow for class effects; assuming treatment effects to be exchangeable within classes slightly improved model fit but could bias estimated treatment effects if exchangeability assumptions were not valid. We enabled all timepoints to be included in the analysis, allowing for repeated measures to increase precision around treatment effects and avoid bias associated with selecting timepoints for meta-analysis.The methods we developed for modelling repeated measures and allowing for missing data may be adapted for use in other MTC meta-analyses.

A systematic review, evidence synthesis and meta-analysis of quantitative and qualitative studies evaluating the clinical effectiveness, the cost-effectiveness, safety and acceptability of interventions to prevent postnatal depression

“…The model for the treatment effects follows that for a NMA of repeated measures as presented by Dakin et al 132 We estimate the treatment effects separately for each time such that:…”

Acupuncture for chronic pain and depression in primary care: a programme of research

“…Mapping algorithms were identified using the University of Oxford's Health Economics Research Centre (HERC) database of studies mapping from HRQoL or clinical measures to the EQ-5D. 234,235 When using this tool and when multiple mapping algorithms were available for a given instrument, the preferred algorithm was selected on the basis of the sample size, adequacy of statistical modelling and relevance of study population. The selection of the outcome to be mapped was not at random.…”

“…222 When SEs were not reported and could not be derived from the reported data, they were imputed using the methods described by Dakin et al, 234 which allow for the uncertainty in the imputation process.…”

Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis to Compare Dapagliflozin with other Diabetes Medications in Combination with Metformin for Adults with Type 2 Diabetes

“…For continuous endpoints both the mean and standard error were required for the NMA. Missing standard errors were calculated within WinBUGs by assuming that observed and unobserved values were exchangeable, and that sample variances followed a gamma distribution with a common standard deviation [15,16]. This allowed the NMA to make greater use of the available data.…”