2018 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/iedm.2018.8614659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed-Signal Neuromorphic Inference Accelerators: Recent Results and Future Prospects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the hardware experiment, the weight refresh operation was distributed across training examples as opposed to periodically refreshing the whole array during training, which allowed it to be performed in parallel with the weight update computation in the digital unit (see Supplementary Note 8). These optimizations resulted in 139× improvement in the energy consumption of the (Bavandpour et al, 2018;Marinella et al, 2018;Chang et al, 2019;Park et al, 2019;Hirtzlin et al, 2020). For training, our approach compares favorably with a digital spiking neural network (254.3 nJ/image) (Park et al, 2019) and is also close to an analogonly approach using 3T1C+PCM synaptic devices (48 nJ/image) (Chang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In contrast to the hardware experiment, the weight refresh operation was distributed across training examples as opposed to periodically refreshing the whole array during training, which allowed it to be performed in parallel with the weight update computation in the digital unit (see Supplementary Note 8). These optimizations resulted in 139× improvement in the energy consumption of the (Bavandpour et al, 2018;Marinella et al, 2018;Chang et al, 2019;Park et al, 2019;Hirtzlin et al, 2020). For training, our approach compares favorably with a digital spiking neural network (254.3 nJ/image) (Park et al, 2019) and is also close to an analogonly approach using 3T1C+PCM synaptic devices (48 nJ/image) (Chang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…𝐼 𝑖𝑗 = 𝐼 𝑚𝑖𝑛 + 𝑤 𝑖𝑗 (𝐼 𝑚𝑎𝑥 − 𝐼 𝑚𝑖𝑛 ) (iii) Each column of the programmable current sinks is connected to a load capacitor 𝐶 𝑗 . A threshold (neuron) circuit proposed in [14] with a transfer function given as:…”
Section: Proposed Vmm Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main downside of such circuits is lower input / output impedance, which leads to larger VMM peripheral overhead, especially for memory devices with larger conductances. However, such overhead can be reduced via efficient sharing of peripheral resources, at the cost of decreasing computational throughput [27,28], which should be acceptable given the very high speed of memristor-based VMMs [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%