Mixed methods designs in marketing research

Abstract

Purpose-The purpose of this article is to determine the uses of mixed method research designs published in major marketing journals. Design/methodology/approach-This study involved a content analysis of 2,166 articles published between 2003 and 2009 in nine prominent marketing journals. Findings-A total of 34 mixed method studies implemented data-collection procedures sequentially (79 percent), eight implemented them concurrently (19 percent) and one combined both sequential and concurrent procedures (2 percent). On the whole, priority was skewed more toward quantitative strands, with 27 articles prioritizing quantitative data (63 percent), three articles prioritizing qualitative data (7 percent), and 13 articles prioritizing both equally (30 percent). Research limitations/implications-It is clear that marketing scholars recognize the benefit of mixing qualitative and quantitative research; however, as a discipline we are not demonstrating knowledge of the mixed method literature or procedures, as only one article recognized or mentioned knowledge of mixed method procedures or cited mixed method research. Practical implications-This study provides guidance for researchers in identifying design types appropriate for various rationales or research objectives and models of different design types that have been published in marketing journals. In addition, implications for designing mixed methods studies in marketing include highlighting the need for scholars to specifically address issues such as the timing and priority given to each data type (i.e. sequential or concurrent), and the integration (or mixing) of the both data types. Originality/value-Until now, the role of mixed methods designs in marketing has not been the subject of formal examination. The delineation of the major forms in mixed method designs provides a framework for looking at such design types, which helps to provide more credibility to the field of marketing by providing examples of research designs that are substantially different than single strand studies.

Mixed methods research in The South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences: An investigation of trends in the literature

“…Suffice to say that citations may be used to measure trends and patterns in scholarly communication. The present study builds on others that have used content analysis to establish research and scholarly communication patterns (Harrison & Reilly, 2011;Jordaan et al, 2013).…”

Work integrated learning benefits for student career prospects - mixed mode analysis

“…The context is that two independent researchers working independently of each other, in two different campuses of the same university, conducted independent studies on a similar group of students. The theoretical framework underpinning this study is complex yet simple: a mixed model analysis allows researchers to take a parallel and triangulated view of two different methodologies and results around a common theme and/or phenomenon (Leech and Onwuegbuzie 2007;Harrison and Reilly 2011).…”

“…This empirical article presents the findings of a transdisciplinary, mixed methods comparative study (Harrison and Reilly 2011) on the benefits of the implementation of WIL in Higher Education. The three research objectives of this article are as follows:…”

Defining Health Service Eco-System “Infection”: A Critical Analysis of Patient Surveys

“…This calls for mixed method (Harrison & Reilly, 2011) able to grasp, through an exploratory approach based on ethnographic research, how interactions, resource integration and engagement practices can boost value co-creation. After the classification of different co-creation activities, a quantitative evaluation of quality and value co-creation practices should be conducted.…”