“…In contrast, it adsorbs only 24 cm 3 /g and 16.7 cm 3 /g of CO 2 at 273 K and 298 K, respectively ( Figure 2C). Isosteric enthalpies of adsorption (Q st ) were calculated from sorption isotherms at 273 K and 298 K. Low loading Q st (C 2 H 2 , 38.6 kJ/mol) and Q st (CO 2 , 25.6 kJ/mol; Figure 2D) Figure S22), which is higher than leading C 2 H 2 -capture sorbents including ZJU-196 (25), 41 FeNiM′MOF (24), 42 [Ni 3 (HCOO) 6 ] (22), 43 DICRO-4-Ni-i (18.2), 44 TCuCl (16.0), 45 HOF-3 (14.0), 46 MIL-100(Fe) (12.5), 47 TIFSIX-2-Cu-i (10), 11 ZJUT-2a (10), 48 TCuBr (9.1), 45 SSNU-45 (8.5), 49 FJU-22a (7.1), 50 ZJU-60a (6.7), 51 UTSA-83a (6.2), 23 and MUF-17 (6) 52 (Table S5). The high S AC (1:1) at 1 bar derived from single-component isotherms and Q st differences are indicative of potential suitability for equimolar C 2 H 2 /CO 2 binary mixture separations under dynamic conditions.…”