2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00428-007-0507-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed germ cell sex cord-stromal tumours of the testis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the authors' response, Michal et al 18 noted that the immunohistochemistry of the germ cells in testicular MGC-SCST, although consistent with that of non-neoplastic germ cells, was also similar to that observed in spermatocytic tumour and presented additional illustrations of one of their testicular cases showing more clearly the variation in nuclear size of the germ cells and the presence of atypical mitotic figures. They concluded that the germ cells in testicular MGC-SCST are neoplastic, rather than being entrapped.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the authors' response, Michal et al 18 noted that the immunohistochemistry of the germ cells in testicular MGC-SCST, although consistent with that of non-neoplastic germ cells, was also similar to that observed in spermatocytic tumour and presented additional illustrations of one of their testicular cases showing more clearly the variation in nuclear size of the germ cells and the presence of atypical mitotic figures. They concluded that the germ cells in testicular MGC-SCST are neoplastic, rather than being entrapped.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Michal et al 12 first noted variation in nuclear size of the germ cells in their three cases of testicular MGC-SCST and considered the disparity similar to that seen in spermatocytic tumour. The germ cells in the case illustrated by Michal et al 18 in their reply to the editor showed distinct variation in nuclear size, atypical mitotic figures and high MIB1 expression. The latter two features would not be expected in non-transformed spermatogonia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation