2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12678-021-00666-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed Chromate and Molybdate Additives for Cathodic Enhancement in the Chlorate Process

Abstract: The economic viability of the electrochemical chlorate process depends on toxic chromate to induce cathodic selectivity to hydrogen and mitigate reduction of hypochlorite or chlorate. In this study, it is shown that performance of a pilot plant for chlorate production can be sustained when a 1000-fold reduction in chromate concentration is compensated by addition of molybdate. Laboratory measurements employing a Quartz Crystal Microbalance suggest growth of a nanometre-thick hybrid Mo–Cr-oxide film to induce c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…66 As previously seen for dichromate, 31 these oligomers are likely to possess very different catalytic which in turn may render them inert. Furthermore, molybdate was found to adversely affect the selectivity toward Cl 2 generation at the anode 27 as well as increasing the hypochlorite decomposition to oxygen in the electrolyte, 24 which renders it unsuitable as an additive. Similarly, also, arsenates are, despite their potential activity for chlorate formation, unsuitable due to their high toxicity.…”
Section: ■ Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…66 As previously seen for dichromate, 31 these oligomers are likely to possess very different catalytic which in turn may render them inert. Furthermore, molybdate was found to adversely affect the selectivity toward Cl 2 generation at the anode 27 as well as increasing the hypochlorite decomposition to oxygen in the electrolyte, 24 which renders it unsuitable as an additive. Similarly, also, arsenates are, despite their potential activity for chlorate formation, unsuitable due to their high toxicity.…”
Section: ■ Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the research has been focused on the selectivity of the cathode reactions, , but comparably, little efforts have been made to find a suitable replacement for its role as a homogeneous catalyst for chlorate formation. Indeed, most evidence for this important function is quite recent, , even though it has been discussed earlier in more general terms. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limiting current corresponding to hypochlorite electroreduction shifts to lower current densities when 10 mmol L −1 Na 2 MoO 4 is added to the electrolyte, depicting a small retarding effect of the MoO x H y film on the hypochlorite electroreduction. An increase in cathodic current efficiency at small chromate concentrations in the presence of molybdate was recently reported 18 . The cathode potential shifts to less negative potentials in the presence of the molybdate additive: when the Cr VI concentration amounts to 13.5 μmol L −1 , the cathode potential shifts 260 mV to less negative values at 300 mA cm −2 compared to the values obtained in molybdate‐free electrolytes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…An increase in cathodic current efficiency at small chromate concentrations in the presence of molybdate was recently reported. 18 The cathode potential shifts to less negative potentials in the presence of the molybdate additive: when the Cr VI concentration amounts to 13.5 μmol L −1 , the cathode potential shifts 260 mV to less negative values at 300 mA cm −2 compared to the values obtained in molybdate-free electrolytes. Also, the inhibiting effect of molybdate on the hypochlorite reduction could be further enhanced by adding low amounts of chromate to the electrolyte (see polarization curves in green in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The principal argument is the formation of a chromium hydroxide (Cr­(OH) 3 )/chromium oxide (Cr 2 O 3 ) layer on the electrode surface that is considered to hinder the hypochlorite reduction acting as a diaphragm. A similar argument has been promulgated during the formation of lepidocrocite (γ-FeOOH) and some other alkaline hydroxides for different types of chlorate productions. Cerium oxide can quickly form a layer composed of cerium oxide and cerium hydroxide when immersed in an aqueous media that is favorable in an alkaline medium due to the presence of Ce 4+ and Ce 3+ . In the presence of this layer, the electrode selectivity toward hypochlorite reduction decreases in favor of hydrogen evolution due to hydroxylation of the metal site blocking the active site for hypochlorite reduction …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%