2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2006.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mixed bundling auctions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(24 reference statements)
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…valuations for the bundle's parts (e.g., Adams & Yellen 1976, Jehiel et al 2007, Armstrong & Vickers 2010. However, several behavioral concepts suggest that a decision maker may exhibit a different valuation for two goods if they are bundled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…valuations for the bundle's parts (e.g., Adams & Yellen 1976, Jehiel et al 2007, Armstrong & Vickers 2010. However, several behavioral concepts suggest that a decision maker may exhibit a different valuation for two goods if they are bundled.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not inconsistent with the results in McAfee,McMillan and Whinston (1989) and PhilippeJehiel, Moritz Meyer-ter-Vehn and Benny Moldovanu (2007). They showed that for "generic" continuous valuation distributions, a monopolist seller's revenue will be higher under mixed bundling in posted price and auction settings respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…This inefficiency will typically vanish as the number of buyers increases. Jehiel, Meyer-Ter-Vehn, and Moldovanu (2007) study auctions with "mixed bundles" and show that they are often revenue superior to no bundling and to pure bundling. Ghosh, Nazerzadeh, and Sundararajan (2007) explore the same question in the context of the digital advertising market.…”
Section: Pricing and Bundlingmentioning
confidence: 99%