1993
DOI: 10.1080/00087114.1993.10797255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitotic karyotype analysis in theVignagenus by means of an image analyser

Abstract: SUMMARY -Detailed karyotypes of fourMarker chromosomes were also identified within each species, thus making possible the species identification by using their correspondent karyotype.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(5 reference statements)
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The current TCLs of the Vigna cultivated species were similar to those reported by Shamurailatpam et al . () but considerably different from those described in several other reports (in which the TCLs of Vigna species were <20 μm; Venora & Saccardo ; Venora et al . ; de A Bortoleti et al .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current TCLs of the Vigna cultivated species were similar to those reported by Shamurailatpam et al . () but considerably different from those described in several other reports (in which the TCLs of Vigna species were <20 μm; Venora & Saccardo ; Venora et al . ; de A Bortoleti et al .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…Cytogenetic studies on cultivated and wild Vigna species have primarily been restricted to karyomorphological descriptions ( e.g . Sen & Bhowal ; Frahm‐Leliveld ; Joseph & Bouwkamp ; Li ; Rao & Chandel ; Venora & Saccardo ; Venora et al . ; Chen ; Osuji & Edeoga ; Shamurailatpam et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karyomorphometric analyses of the four I, Tgna species were partially published in Venora & Saccardo (1993). The four species revealed rather symmetrical karyotypes, thus fitting the first four of the 12 categories Stebbins (1971) used to describe karyotype asymmetry.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karyotype morphometry was made possible by the use of an automated system of image analysis IBAS 2000 by Kontron-Zeiss, which allowed to measure chromosomal indices with a level of precision that cannot be achieved with manual systems (Venora et al, 1991). Slides were prepared and analysed according to Venora & Saccardo (1993).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system offers many advantages over conventional cytological and chromosomal techniques. It enables the analysis of a large number of chromosome spreads, saving the time and effort; besides, the accuracy of the data is high and the reproducibility of the image manipulation is complete and very sensitive helping to reduce error factor to minimal (KOO et al 2002;SELVI and BIGAZZI 2001;AL-TURKI et al 2000;JOSEPH et al 1999;KONIG and EBERT 1997;VENORA and SACCARDO 1993;ERRICO et al 1991;FUKUI and KAKEDA 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%