2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy in the emerging field of massively parallel sequencing

Abstract: HighlightsWe provide an update on developments in mtDNA forensic genetics.We review the recent literature for the detection of heteroplasmy using next generation sequencing techniques.We highlight artefacts and problems in datasets.We discuss the implications for forensic practice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
102
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
4
102
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower VF of the additional "discordant" PHPs indicates they were below the range of detection with STS, but detectable with NGS. The reproducibility of the PHPs and the fact they are consistent with reported patterns for coding region PHPs [37] further support the authenticity of these low level variants.…”
Section: Phpssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The lower VF of the additional "discordant" PHPs indicates they were below the range of detection with STS, but detectable with NGS. The reproducibility of the PHPs and the fact they are consistent with reported patterns for coding region PHPs [37] further support the authenticity of these low level variants.…”
Section: Phpssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…region is a mutational hotspot. This high rate of synonymous MT-ND5 variants are not totally a surprise given the high rate of heteroplasmic alleles in MT-ND5 also found in blood samples (Just et al, 2015) and in oncocytic tumors (Gasparre et al, 2007(Gasparre et al, , 2013.…”
Section: Not Equal Very Strongmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…are much less balanced ( Figure 1B) and the lower A signal was not detected by two participants (Table 3 (Table 3), which is understandable [21,22].…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 88%