“…Many other studies on the use of NGS technologies for forensic genetics and mtDNA analysis have been published (Chaitanya et al, 2015;Churchill, Stoljarova, King, & Budowle, 2018;Hollard et al, 2017;Just, Irwin, & Parson, 2015;Just, Scheible, Fast, Sturk-Andreaggi, Higginbotham, et al, 2014;Just, Scheible, Fast, Sturk-Andreaggi, Röck, et al, 2014;Lopopolo, Børsting, Pereira, & Morling, 2016;Ma et al, 2018;Marshall et al, 2017;Ovchinnikov, Malek, Kjelland, & Drees, 2016;Park et al, 2017;Templeton et al, 2013;Young, King, Budowle, & Armogida, 2017). However, further validation studies and specialized software functionality tailored to forensic practice should be produced in order to facilitate the incorporation of NGS processing into standard casework applications (Amorim & Pinto, 2018;Peck et al, 2016). In the meantime, and according to current international guidelines (W. Parson et al, 2014;Prinz et al, 2007), Sanger sequencing still continues to be an adequate method for mtDNA analysis for forensic human identification, and is used in most casework laboratories worldwide (Ballard, 2016).…”