2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.10.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitochondrial DNA copy number measured by mitoscore is associated to trophectoderm quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Embryos with lower implantation potential and lower trophectoderm quality have a higher MitoScore, probably because of increased mitochondrial biogenesis. According to the association between trophectoderm quality and MitoScore, it seems that changes in mitochondrial biogenesis have a negative effect on the proliferative capacity of trophoblast and subsequent implantation [ 27 ]. Although stress results in elevating the metabolic output of the embryo as a compensatory mechanism, there is no document of association between perceived stress and increased MitoScore [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Embryos with lower implantation potential and lower trophectoderm quality have a higher MitoScore, probably because of increased mitochondrial biogenesis. According to the association between trophectoderm quality and MitoScore, it seems that changes in mitochondrial biogenesis have a negative effect on the proliferative capacity of trophoblast and subsequent implantation [ 27 ]. Although stress results in elevating the metabolic output of the embryo as a compensatory mechanism, there is no document of association between perceived stress and increased MitoScore [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three more single-clinic studies with large sample sizes ( n > 10 0) we re p Czech Republic), one from Bahceci IVF Center (Istanbul, Turkey), and one from IVI Valencia (Valencia, Spain). All three failed to establish any predictive power of implantation by mtDNA copy number [11][12][13]. Importantly, both latter studies relied on the services of Igenomix to quantify mtDNA in their embryos, thereby controlling for possible technical differences regarding mtDNA quantitation.…”
Section: Making Sense Of It Allmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, both latter studies relied on the services of Igenomix to quantify mtDNA in their embryos, thereby controlling for possible technical differences regarding mtDNA quantitation. It is conceivable that all mentioned independent studies [7,8,[11][12][13]] randomly happened to be examples of those clinics in which mtDNA levels hold no predictive power at all. If this scenario is actually the case, future autonomous studies conducted blindly by additional clinics should reveal a clearer picture-so far, we are unaware of any clinic that having analyzed significant sample sizes, independently validated blastocyst mtDNA copy number as a biomarker of implantation.…”
Section: Making Sense Of It Allmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Victor et al reported a modified method that demonstrated mtDNA lacked of predictive value (17). Three independent studies presented that mtDNA content failed to establish predictive power of implantation at the conference of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis International Society (PGDIS) (19–21). Moreover, Treff et al demonstrated that levels of mtNDA didn’t predict the reproductive potential in the similar gold standard : double embryo transfer (DET)(18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%