2015
DOI: 10.1111/bij.12554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mito-nuclear discordance with evidence of shared ancestral polymorphism and selection in cactophilic species ofDrosophila

Abstract: The Drosophila serido haplogroup is a monophyletic group composed of the following four cryptic and cactophilic species that are endemic to eastern Brazil: D. borborema, D. gouveai, D. seriema and D. serido. Here, we investigate the mito‐nuclear discordance in these species found among the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) mitochondrial gene, the autosomal alpha‐Esterase‐5 (α‐Est5) and the X‐linked period gene (per). Our analysis indicates that shared polymorphisms in these three molecular markers may be ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, hybridization is especially common in zooplankton (Hebert 1985), especially in the genus Daphnia (Ma et al 2019 a ). However, other explanations for cyto‐nuclear discordances, for instance incomplete lineage sorting of ancestral polymorphisms (Franco et al 2015), or selection acting on mitochondrial genes (Pavlova et al 2013), cannot be ruled out. Further work, such as the use of high‐resolution nuclear markers (such as microsatellites) or relevant experimental crossings, will be required to confirm hybridization in the C. sphaericus species complex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, hybridization is especially common in zooplankton (Hebert 1985), especially in the genus Daphnia (Ma et al 2019 a ). However, other explanations for cyto‐nuclear discordances, for instance incomplete lineage sorting of ancestral polymorphisms (Franco et al 2015), or selection acting on mitochondrial genes (Pavlova et al 2013), cannot be ruled out. Further work, such as the use of high‐resolution nuclear markers (such as microsatellites) or relevant experimental crossings, will be required to confirm hybridization in the C. sphaericus species complex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incomplete lineage sorting (ILS) of ancestral polymorphisms is another possible scenario [ 17 , 19 ] as assumed for example for the mito-nuclear discordance observed in the Drosophila serido haplogroup [ 21 ]. Distinguishing between ILS and introgression is difficult and often the only indications might be drawn from genetic data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes (numts) or pseudogenes from the mitochondrial genome that originate from duplication events might be amplified rather than the functional target gene [ 18 ]. On the other hand, cyto-nuclear discordance may be caused by various biological processes, like hybridization and subsequent introgression of the mitochondrial genome [ 15 , 16 , 19 ], incomplete lineage sorting of ancestral polymorphisms [ 19 – 21 ], or selection acting on mitochondrial genes, either direct due to, e.g., environmental factors [ 22 , 23 ], or through indirect selection induced by maternally inherited symbionts [reviewed by 24 ]. Thus, firm conclusions about the delimitations of species based on genetic data should be drawn from a combination of different approaches, e.g., combining mtDNA and nuclear DNA, and assessing evidence on the level of gene flow between putative species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mardulyn, Mikhailov & Pasteels () proposed that a zone of secondary contact may homogenize the genetic diversity in Chrysomelidae, making it equal to the diversity of the rest of the populations. Moreover, the absence of genetic structure in mitochondrial (mt)DNA in insects could be a consequence of the maintenance of ancestral polymorphism or even the occurrence of introgressive mtDNA hybridization (Franco et al ., ), although this must be evaluated further to obtain more evidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%