2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2014.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitigation strategies for radiation damage in the analysis of ancient materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
67
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
4
67
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…28 This awareness stems not only from the significance of those materials -they are unique testimonies of our past-, but also from their very nature: because they are mostly heterogeneous in chemical composition, in phase distribution and in topology, their spectroscopic investigation requires the use of micro-probes usually coupled to high photon fluxes, leading to high photon doses absorbed by the sample. The pigment…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 This awareness stems not only from the significance of those materials -they are unique testimonies of our past-, but also from their very nature: because they are mostly heterogeneous in chemical composition, in phase distribution and in topology, their spectroscopic investigation requires the use of micro-probes usually coupled to high photon fluxes, leading to high photon doses absorbed by the sample. The pigment…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observation of beam-induced changes during the characterization of cultural heritage materials by intense radiation sources (synchrotron radiation, ion and laser beams) has revealed the necessity of studying radiation damage mechanisms and has encouraged the development of mitigation strategies [1]. Both issues are relevant for the analysis of paintings, given the known sensitivity of pigments and painting materials to irradiation by proton induced X-ray emission (PIXE) [2 and references therein], by synchrotron X-rays [3] or by lasers [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although care should be taken when exposing photosensitive pigments to energetic X-rays,t he dose deposited onto the painting during the MA-XRPD analyses was about 10 7 times smaller compared to typical XRPD SR investigations. [7] Thet wo-dimensional (2D) X-ray patterns collected at each pixel location were azimuthally integrated to onedimensional (1D) diffractograms (diffracted intensity versus scattering angle,2 q,o rm omentum transfer, Q). These profiles can be described with am odel of which the parameters are determined by al east-squares fitting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%