Mitigating reputational risks in supply chains

Abstract

2015),"Modern slavery challenges to supply chain management", Supply Access to this document was granted through an Emerald subscription provided by emerald-srm:263496 [] For AuthorsIf you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information. About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.comEmerald is a global publisher linking research and practice to the benefit of society. The company manages a portfolio of more than 290 journals and over 2,350 books and book series volumes, as well as providing an extensive range of online products and additional customer resources and services.Emerald is both COUNTER 4 and TRANSFER compliant. The organization is a partner of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and also works with Portico and the LOCKSS initiative for digital archive preservation.

Supply Chain Integrity: A Key to Sustainable Supply Chain Management

“…Thus, firms are more likely to be punished for not having SCI than they are to be rewarded or recognized for having SCI. Therefore, SCI may be a means of reputational risk mitigation (Lemke and Petersen ; Petersen and Lemke ), and should be explored with such a perspective in mind.…”

Biases in consumers' assessment of environmental damage in food chains and how investments in reputation can help

“…Investments in reputation can reverse this orientation by dedicating more attention to the market, benefitting the whole supply chain. Retailers and manufacturers, as 'reputational owners', are in an optimal position to invest in reputation, because proximity to consumers exposes them to the greatest risk of reputational damage (e.g., Roehrich et al, 2014, Czinkota et al, 2014, Lemke and Petersen, 2013, Petersen and Lemke, 2015. Reputation can then be maintained by providing consumers with accurate and relevant information that they can easily access and understand, minimising undesired spill over effects of reputation caused by careless agents along the supply chain whilst helping consumers make better choices.…”

“…Reputation in the supply chain context has generated a considerable degree of interest amongst researchers (e.g., Roehrich et al, 2014, Czinkota et al, 2014, Lemke and Petersen, 2013, Petersen and Lemke, 2015. Its role on perceptual biases can be illustrated in a model of information flow developed by Lemke and Petersen (2013), which outlines the mechanisms in Figure 5.…”

“…Some manufacturers have hundreds of partners upstream contributing to a product, even prior to that product moving on to a retailer(Petersen and Lemke, 2015).…”

Analysing the risks of adopting circular economy initiatives in manufacturing supply chains

“…To identify these risks and their impact, this paper refers to multiple case studies and approaches to evaluate/analyse and propose a risk mitigation strategy. The research mainly focuses on sustainable and closed‐loop SC reputational risks as that is the central drive in an organisation to implement sustainable SC (Petersen & Lemke, 2015; Dahlmann & Roehrich, 2019; Dias Galuchi, Rosales, & Batalha, 2019; Frei, Jack, & Krzyzaniak, 2020); risks can have a negative impact on financial status (financial risk) due to lack of product sales and retailer procurement sharing, which indirectly affects the inventory process, leading also to operational risks (Bressanelli, Perona, & Saccani, 2019; Hussain & Malik, 2020; Macdonald, Zobel, Melnyk, & Griffis, 2018).…”