2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2014.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mitigating arable soil compaction: A review and analysis of available cost and benefit data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

5
95
0
16

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
5
95
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…However, chiseling is an energy-intensive operation, requires investment to purchase ripper and implies changes in the management system (CHAMEN, 2015), in contrast to the provision of minimum soil mobilization implicit in the NTS. In addition, the change in soil properties promoted by soil chiseling has presented short duration (DRESCHER et al, 2012;SILVA et al, 2012), often less than one year (ALVAREZ, et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, chiseling is an energy-intensive operation, requires investment to purchase ripper and implies changes in the management system (CHAMEN, 2015), in contrast to the provision of minimum soil mobilization implicit in the NTS. In addition, the change in soil properties promoted by soil chiseling has presented short duration (DRESCHER et al, 2012;SILVA et al, 2012), often less than one year (ALVAREZ, et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These indicators do not consider the influence of parameters of the equipment (technology) on the created harvest. Therefore, scientists pay considerable attention to studying of interaction of a running gear of tractors with the soil and to influence of soil compaction on the created harvest [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Operating conditions of tractors and their influence on the indicators of efficiency are investigated [16; 17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entretanto, o uso dessa prática deve ser limitado, pois requer elevado consumo energético, investimento em equipamentos e mudanças no sistema de cultivo (Chamen, 2015), em que os custos aumentam proporcionalmente à profundidade da camada compactada, e os benefícios dependem da textura do solo e da profundidade e da frequência da operação. Além disso, os benefícios da escarificação do solo sobre o rendimento de culturas nem sempre se concretizam (Gubiani et al, 2013;Nunes et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified