2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3156.2007.00465.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Missing out: offenders with learning disabilities and the criminal justice system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
42
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
42
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…1995; Talbot 2008). The disadvantaged position of people with learning disabilities in mainstream society (Barnes 1991) does not significantly improve within the criminal justice system (Hayes 2007). When people with learning disabilities come to the attention of criminal justice authorities, responses tend to be extreme with the offender being either acquitted or given the maximum punishment with no or little chance of rehabilitation (Cockram 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1995; Talbot 2008). The disadvantaged position of people with learning disabilities in mainstream society (Barnes 1991) does not significantly improve within the criminal justice system (Hayes 2007). When people with learning disabilities come to the attention of criminal justice authorities, responses tend to be extreme with the offender being either acquitted or given the maximum punishment with no or little chance of rehabilitation (Cockram 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early identification is important in order to provide appropriate support and treatment that takes into account clients' cognitive limitations. When the presence of ID is not recognized, the individual may wrongfully be considered as being uncooperative, behaviorally disordered, or psychological disturbed (Hayes, 2005(Hayes, , 2007. A misinterpretation of behavior or misdiagnosis, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A misinterpretation of behavior or misdiagnosis, e.g. of a mental illness instead of ID, may lead to a placement in a unit which is inappropriate to meet the needs of the individual and will ultimately result in ineffective interventions (Hayes, 2005(Hayes, , 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Hayes (2007), organizations established for the purpose of defending the rights and interests of people with intellectual disabilities show little interest in potential members that have been imprisoned. In fact, the status of being a (former) inmate leads people to define them as 'dangerous' and thereby as unfit to be integrated with others with similar disabilities (Jones, 2007).…”
Section: Multiple Stigma: Merging Imprisonment With Intellectual Disamentioning
confidence: 99%