2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2014.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Missed Cases in the Detection of Child Abuse Based on Parental Characteristics in the Emergency Department (the Hague Protocol)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To start, eligible parents could have been missed at the emergency department. We do not know if this happened in our sample, but in an analysis of the Hague protocol, 8 out of 120 cases (7%) were missed, for various reasons (Diderich et al ). Furthermore, of all eligible families, 8% refused to be examined at the outpatient pediatric department, and another 17% was examined but refused study participation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…To start, eligible parents could have been missed at the emergency department. We do not know if this happened in our sample, but in an analysis of the Hague protocol, 8 out of 120 cases (7%) were missed, for various reasons (Diderich et al ). Furthermore, of all eligible families, 8% refused to be examined at the outpatient pediatric department, and another 17% was examined but refused study participation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Consensus was reached on all items except for the "Typical locations for accidental and non-accidental injuries' item, which the authors decided not to replace with the other suggested items (e.g., TEN-4-FACESp, a validated tool to help screen children under 4 years of age with bruising to differentiate accidental from non-accidental injury [23]). The final ver-sion of the tool comprised six parts (see appendix): 1) six screening questions adapted from the validated ESCAPE instrument [24] to be used in case of suspected CAN or for the implementation of a general screening in the ED, 2) alarming clinical/behavioural findings of abuse/neglect within the context of the history [25], 3) child and 4) family factors that increase vulnerability to CAN, 5) typical locations for accidental and non-accidental injuries [26], and 6) suggested consensus and experience-based example questions for approaching the child and their family for suspected child abuse. We found this especially useful to respond to the expressed (emotional) challenge of approaching the child and their family in case of suspected CAN and to facilitate a possible entry point for the conversation that could save a life.…”
Section: Development Of the Cognitive Aid Toolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(clinical, history, socio-economic factors), screening questions for staff [24], sample questions for facilitated communication with child abuse victims and their families, and a graphical representation of typical locations of accidental and non-accidental injuries in children [26]. We suggest that other resources be added individually (e.g., contact details of the hospital CPS, linkto the local child abuse referral pathway, and relevant local web sites).…”
Section: Original Articlementioning
confidence: 99%