2006
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/del098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Misoprostol for cervical ripening in non-pregnant women: a randomized double-blind controlled trial of oral versus vaginal regimens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3,5,12 A study by Batukean et al found that vaginal administration was more effective than the oral route for cervical ripening in non pregnant premenopausal women while the others found no difference between both the routes. 5 In addition, sublingual route was more effective when compared with vaginal and oral routes for pregnancy termination 8 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…3,5,12 A study by Batukean et al found that vaginal administration was more effective than the oral route for cervical ripening in non pregnant premenopausal women while the others found no difference between both the routes. 5 In addition, sublingual route was more effective when compared with vaginal and oral routes for pregnancy termination 8 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the above studies the time interval varied from 4-24 hours for oral and vaginal routes. 3,5,6 Lee et al used relatively shorter time interval of 6-8 hours. 12 The sublingual misoprostol was administered with an interval of 2-4 hours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations