2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00191-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mismatch negativity (MMN) as a tool for investigating auditory discrimination and sensory memory in infants and children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
152
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 246 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
9
152
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1B, shaded regions). These selections captured the peak of the response in the group average data and conformed to the classic time ranges for MMR documented in the infant literature (25,29,30). The MMRs in the target windows were then averaged for each participant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1B, shaded regions). These selections captured the peak of the response in the group average data and conformed to the classic time ranges for MMR documented in the infant literature (25,29,30). The MMRs in the target windows were then averaged for each participant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences have been documented between infants and adults in the MMR with later peak latency, smaller magnitude, and a shift in polarity for infants from a positive to a negative MMR with age and experience. The MMR has been considered fairly stable and readily observed across development (25,26). MEG technology, with its excellent temporal resolution (millisecond) and good spatial resolution for measuring neural activities (27), allows examination of the MMR at the cortical level.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some limitations of this work can be pointed out, such as the methodological diversity of the articles, regarding the parameters used to perform the MMN and presentation of the results found, regarding the values of latency and amplitude, and there is no standardization for population. There is no consensus to date on the best protocol to be used and normality patterns in the child population still need to be specified (6,13) , due to the fact that there are several parameters used to investigate and evaluate the Potential MMN, depending on the characteristics of the study population and estimated objectives.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Latency informs the course time of processing activity, while wave amplitude demonstrates the extent of neural allocation involved in the cognitive processes of potentials (10) . MMN is a procedure that has a good correlation with the results found in subjective evaluations that, similarly, analyzed the ability of auditory discrimination (6,13) . Its main advantage, compared to other exams, is that the wave appears independently of the attention of the individual to the presented sound stimuli (1,4,6,7,10,14) , that is, it can be registered without the influence of the attention of the subject and without requiring tasks, making it particularly suitable for clinical studies in evaluating the child population (4,11) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation