2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mismatch between food sustainability and consumer acceptance toward innovation technologies among Millennial students: The case of Shelf Life Extension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
44
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
6
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…People allocated to these clusters perceived more negative effects of using new technologies in food production. The results of other researchers have confirmed that a greater interest in sustainability has led to the rejection of technology [76]. A similar approach by Tech-Scep and Tech-Trad to the new technologies was associated with the perception of a greater threat to the environment, limited naturalness of food and negative health consequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…People allocated to these clusters perceived more negative effects of using new technologies in food production. The results of other researchers have confirmed that a greater interest in sustainability has led to the rejection of technology [76]. A similar approach by Tech-Scep and Tech-Trad to the new technologies was associated with the perception of a greater threat to the environment, limited naturalness of food and negative health consequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Yoon and Chung [93] suggest that hygienic and environmental risks and hedonic benefits influence Millennials' attitudes and visit intentions towards food-truck dining experiences. Moreover, on the one hand, Cavaliere and Ventura [94] prove that eco-friendly Millennial students can perceive innovation technologies in food products as a safety risk, on the other hand, Öz et al, [95] highlight that Millennials, with higher levels of education as to biotechnology concerns, remark less risk and have fewer safety concerns than non-Millennials towards genetically modified technology and products. Lastly, Harun et al, [96] evidence that Millennials are not influenced in their fast food purchase intention by Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Bollani et al, [51] underline that climate labels are not well-known by Italian Millennials; Thompson and Barrett [97] evidence that Millennials believe that wine increases enjoyment of food and conviviality; Pomarici and Vecchio [98] show that female and older Millennials who live in an urban area are more interested in buying labelled sustainable wines than others; Henley et al, [99] underline the importance of some labeling information, as sensorial characteristics, in influencing Millennials' wine purchase intentions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They represent the largest generational cohort [2,23], so their purchasing power makes them an appealing target group for many consumer industries and attracts many companies towards understanding the needs and behavior of this customer base. Consequently, millennials have become a remarkable group for study given their distinctive behavior as compared to other generations [7], their sharing of common values [24,25], enjoyment of life experiences [26], pursuance of specific motivations [3,5,14,27], and purchasing behavior [24,28]. Millennials are characterized as having a higher education level than other generations [1,29] or by the intensive use and adaptation of technology in their daily lives [17,28,30,31].…”
Section: Food Naturalness and Millennials' Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of this paper is to explore attributes important to millennial university students when evaluating food naturalness. It cannot be disregarded that present and future tendencies of food consumption are specified by what millennials value the most [1][2][3][4][5]. The importance of food naturalness for consumers and its impact on their behavior has been widely studied in the literature (e.g., [6][7][8][9]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%