2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Misjudging frustrations in spin liquids from oversimplified use of Curie-Weiss law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, certain ambiguity in the AFM interaction strengths [by means of different values of negative θ CW at the different applied magnetic fields, as revealed by the respective Curie-Weiss fittings, shown in Fig. 5(a)] is also evident in SLIO, likely in consistent with many other existing QSL systems [8,47,48,57].…”
Section: E DC Magnetic Susceptibility and Spin Polarized Dft Calculat...supporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, certain ambiguity in the AFM interaction strengths [by means of different values of negative θ CW at the different applied magnetic fields, as revealed by the respective Curie-Weiss fittings, shown in Fig. 5(a)] is also evident in SLIO, likely in consistent with many other existing QSL systems [8,47,48,57].…”
Section: E DC Magnetic Susceptibility and Spin Polarized Dft Calculat...supporting
confidence: 76%
“…5(c), clearly reveal absence of coercivity and remanent magnetization even at the lowest measured temperature of 2 K, but the slight nonlinearity probably supports the development of spin correlations in SLIO at low temperatures, quite common in d 4 iridates [44,55,56]. Now in such disordered magnetic system, it should be worthwhile to state that within weak temperature-dependence of the measured dc susceptibility, the Curie-Weiss (C-W) fit- ting parameters always carry some uncertainties which critically depend on both the temperature range of C-W fitting and the applied magnetic fields of measurement [57]. Considering all the possibilities, the C-W analysis (χ = χ 0 + CW (T −ΘCW ) with χ 0 being the temperature independent paramagnetic susceptibility, and C W , Θ CW , the Curie constant and the Curie-Weiss temperature, respectively) on the 10 kOe field-cooled χ(T ) data seems to be most reasonable in the temperature range 100-400 K (see Fig.…”
Section: E DC Magnetic Susceptibility and Spin Polarized Dft Calculat...mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This suggests that Li + @C 60 •− radicals are involved in the magnetic reactions. Fitting the ( χ − χ 0 ) − 1 to the Curie–Weiss law at high temperatures ( T > 175 K) yields a large negative Curie–Weiss temperature, θ cw = −190 K, suggesting strong antiferromagnetic (AF) interactions between the spins ( χ 0 is defined as core diamagnetic or Van–Vleck paramagnetic susceptibility 44 and determined to be 8.8 × 10 − 4 cm 3 mol − 1 in Supporting Information Fig. 7 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in spite of strong SOC, the dc magnetic susceptibility measured in 3 T field (Fig. 1(d)), having qualitative similarity to paramagnets, shows presence of tiny magnetic moments which do not order down to 2 K. From a careful analysis using Curie-Weiss fits [21,25], we obtained an effective moment of around 0.3 µ B /Ir and antiferromagnetic exchanges (θ W ∼ -10 K), in this proposed J = 0 system [21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%