1996
DOI: 10.25223/brad.n14.1996.a6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Miscellaneous taxonomic notes on Aizoaceae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, additional species have been described, based mainly on the 8-locular capsules and connate leaves, however, the absence of valve wings and keel characters are no longer diagnostic for the genus. The artificial nature of the genus was noted by Hartmann (1996) and Klak (2010), who speculated that Octopoma may not be monophyletic. Two groups were identified by Hartmann (1996) Hartmann's (1996) first group but representing the two geographical groupings of Klak (2010), were included in the phylogeny of Klak & al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Subsequently, additional species have been described, based mainly on the 8-locular capsules and connate leaves, however, the absence of valve wings and keel characters are no longer diagnostic for the genus. The artificial nature of the genus was noted by Hartmann (1996) and Klak (2010), who speculated that Octopoma may not be monophyletic. Two groups were identified by Hartmann (1996) Hartmann's (1996) first group but representing the two geographical groupings of Klak (2010), were included in the phylogeny of Klak & al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and Conicosia pugioniformis N.E.Br. These taxa were selected as outgroups as, together with Drosanthemeae, they represent the tribes most closely related to Ruschieae, Dorotheantheae and Apatesieae (Hartmann, 1996;Klak & al., 2003bKlak & al., , 2013. Nuclear regions were excluded as they have been shown to be problematic (Klak & al., 2013), indicating gene duplication or multiple copies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations