2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-3886-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MIS lateral spine surgery: a systematic literature review of complications, outcomes, and economics

Abstract: There is considerable published evidence to support MI-LIF in spinal fusion and advanced applications, though the results of some reports, especially concerning complications, vary greatly depending on technique and instrumentation used. Additional cost-effectiveness analyses would assist in fully understanding the long-term implications of MI-LIF.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 249 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 There were 9 approach-related complications noted in our cohort. These predominantly consisted of mild, transient paresthesia and hip flexion weakness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…8 There were 9 approach-related complications noted in our cohort. These predominantly consisted of mild, transient paresthesia and hip flexion weakness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Benefits of LLIF include decreased postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay, and faster return to ordinary daily living. However, several complications peculiar to LLIF have been reported; these complications include damage to blood and lymphatic vessels, nerves, ureters, and viscera, sometimes causing sexual dysfunction, experienced after an anterior approach 1,[6][7][8] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] However, given the inherent axial and coronal stability of a large anterolateral cage, the structural necessity of invasive/extensive PSF in ALIF/LLIF has come into question, particularly in single-level application. Accordingly, a growing body of literature exploring less invasive and less demanding alternatives for secondary stability in ALIF/LLIF has emerged.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%