2011
DOI: 10.1215/02705346-2010-010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(Mis)Imagining Africa in the New Millennium: The Constant Gardener and Blood Diamond

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 For a discussion regarding the archetypes Cameron identifies and conceptualises, specific to Blood Diamond, see Mafe (2011). 14 (Bradshaw 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 For a discussion regarding the archetypes Cameron identifies and conceptualises, specific to Blood Diamond, see Mafe (2011). 14 (Bradshaw 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coverage has been dominated, however, by sensationalized portrayals of child soldiering, cannibalism and warlordism (see for instance The Vice Guide to Liberia news documentary). Fictionalized accounts in Hollywood movies such as Blood Diamond, the Lord of War or the Constant Gardener co-produced portrayal of contemporary civil wars in Africa as rather apolitical, senseless acts of violence that are primarily fuelled by primordial ethnic hatred and the economic profiteering of local elites (Mafe 2011;Sakota-Kokot 2014). As we elaborate further below, these reductionist explanations were mirrored in some of the binary intellectual constructs surrounding new and old wars as well as greed and grievances in the late 1990s and early 2000s (Collier and Hoeffler 1998;Kaldor 2012).…”
Section: The Formation Of Security Scholarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blindness [2008], Hellboy [2004], Hellboy II: The Golden Army [2008], El espinazo del diablo [The Devil's Backbone 2001] El laberinto del fauno [Pan's Labyrith 2006], and Diarios de motocicleta [Motorcycle Diaries 2004]) the terms of a transnationalised Latin American cinema (including any notion of continental specificity) were much less frequently evoked to describe them and their connection to a sense of the nation or national cinema rarely made (Boyle 2009;Udden 2009;Mafe 2011;). 2 In some academic criticism the first group of films was collectively hailed as the poster films of a Latin American cinematic renaissance (Hart 2004: 13) whilst other criticism downplayed the films' significance in relation to broader continental trends (Page 2009: 10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%