Mirror-mirror on the wall, what climate change adaptation strategies are practiced by the Asian's fishermen of all?

Abstract

This systematic review article focuses on the adaptation strategies of Asian fishermen toward climate change impacts. Generally, the fact that climate change is not a new phenomenon has attracted scholars to conduct numerous relevant studies. Unfortunately, most past researches were not from the perspectives of social science of the Asian's community. Hence, the present study reviewed a considerable amount of past studies on the act of adjusting with environmental change among the Asian fishermen which is known as one of the communities that are highly dependent on nature stability. Meanwhile, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was adopted for the review of the current research which utilised two main journal databases, namely Scopus and Web of Science. Accordingly, the searching efforts resulted in a total of 18 articles that can be analysed systematically. Most importantly, the review managed to formulate five main themes, namely livelihood diversification, social, physical infrastructure, awareness-knowledge-experience, and conservation and enforcement based on the thematic analyses. Overall, further analysis of the five themes resulted in the establishment of a total of 21 sub-themes. Finally, a number of recommendations were presented at the end of this research for the reference of future scholars.

Sorotan Literatur Bersistematik: Pemupukan Kreativiti Matematik dalam Pendidikan Matematik

“…Pada masa yang sama, analisis pengendalian dan pelaporan dapatan artikel telah telah dijalankan dengan merujuk kepada garis paduan model PRISMA (Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). Rujukan terhadap Model PRISMA telah dipilih sebagai panduan kerana dapat membantu para penyelidik mengendalikan maklumat yang diperlukan demi langkah ke langkah dan pada masa yang sama dapat mengekalkan kualiti sorotan yang ingin dihasilkan (Shaffril et al, 2019).…”

Understanding the Concept of Policy Transfer: A Systematic Literature Review Approach

“…In simple words, the researcher searches all relevant keywords related to the research topic simultaneously in both databases. In accordance with previous studies on systematic review, the keywords used might be from thesaurus, variations, related terms, expert opinions, or keywords from past literature (Moher et al, 2009;Bramer et al, 2017;Shaffril et al, 2019). In this study, the keywords used were: Policy Transfer, Policy Borrow*, Policy Converg*, Lesson Draw*, Public Policy, and Government.…”

“…At this point, out of 1,590 articles from the advanced search, 700 articles were removed. Then, the process was refined by re-evaluating the articles based on research questions and unrelated articles were excluded (Shaffril et al, 2019). From there, the researchers selected a number of inclusion parameters such as timeline (years), subject area, document type, source type, language, and access type as the search configurations as stated in Table 2.…”

“…Second, the selection of articles is based on restricted inclusion and exclusion criteria which allows the researchers to cope with research bias and more accurate results can be achieved according to research objective. As a result, this paper adds value to the existing literature by systematically review relevant articles based on systematic procedures from keywords identification to articles eligibility analysis (Moher, Liberati, Tetzlaff, Altman, & The PRISMA Group, 2009;Shaffril, Samah, Samsuddin, & Ali, 2019). The development of this systematic review works upon the research objectives to shed lights on the understanding of policy transfer and identify significant themes (concepts) reflecting the practice of policy transfer regardless of its origin and receiving countries.…”

“…(2) Results and discussion were provided according to themes emerged from systematic review; and (3) Limitations and recommendations were proposed for future research direction. It is imperative to note that, since this study employed systematic review, thus, the literature review section is omitted because the review will be presented in the results and discussion part (Shaffril et al, 2019).…”