2021
DOI: 10.3892/or.2021.8112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

miR‑375/Yes‑associated protein axis regulates IL‑6 and TGF‑β expression, which is involved in the cisplatin‑induced resistance of liver cancer cells

Abstract: Chemotherapy resistance is one of the major challenges in the treatment of liver cancer (LC). The present study aimed to investigate the potential roles of Yes-associated protein (YAP), the core component of the Hippo signaling pathway, in chemoresistance of LC. YAP expression and its function in chemoresistance of LC cells were investigated. It was revealed that the expression levels and nuclear localization of YAP were increased in cisplatin (CDDP)-resistant LC (LC/CDDP) cells. The targeted inhibition of YAP… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evaluation of miRNA expression among these chemoresistant cell lines demonstrated a positive association with miR-375 expression, which may be one of the first studies to validate this result in a commercially available cell line [ 20 , 21 , 22 ]. Studies of miR-375 among liver cancers have demonstrated that this resistance may function through modulation of Non-SMC Condensin II Complex Subunit G2 (NCAPG2), Interleukin 6 (IL-6) and Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) [ 34 , 35 ]. Additional research studies of osteosarcoma have demonstrated that miR-375 may function through interactions with Autophagy related gene 2B (ATG2B) and Myeloid leukemia cell differentiation protein (Mcl-1) [ 36 , 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation of miRNA expression among these chemoresistant cell lines demonstrated a positive association with miR-375 expression, which may be one of the first studies to validate this result in a commercially available cell line [ 20 , 21 , 22 ]. Studies of miR-375 among liver cancers have demonstrated that this resistance may function through modulation of Non-SMC Condensin II Complex Subunit G2 (NCAPG2), Interleukin 6 (IL-6) and Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) [ 34 , 35 ]. Additional research studies of osteosarcoma have demonstrated that miR-375 may function through interactions with Autophagy related gene 2B (ATG2B) and Myeloid leukemia cell differentiation protein (Mcl-1) [ 36 , 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While its overexpression has been recognized to predominantly suppress all the core hallmarks of HCC [ 24 , 27 , 28 , 29 ]. The involvement of miR-375 in each of these hallmarks proceeds by directly targeting several important oncogenes-driven hepatocarcinogenesis like AEG-1 , MDR1 , P-gp , YAP1 , ATG7 , ATG14 , Bcl-2 , SIRT5 , and AKT/Ras [ 14 , 22 , 25 , 30 , 93 ]. Therefore, miR-375 has been confirmed to simultaneously play a strong anti-HCC effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypermethylation of CpG islands of miR-375 promoter has been reported as the main cause of its down-regulation [ 21 , 22 ]. Restoring the expression of miR-375 has been found to significantly repress the major hallmarks and all signaling networks of HCC, including cell growth, proliferation, anti-apoptosis, angiogenesis, glucose metabolism, autophagy, drug resistance, migration, and invasion [ 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ]. These suppressive effects of miR-375 are achieved via its multi-targeting key oncogenes involved in hepatocarcinogenic pathways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mRNA‒miRNA network was constructed to explore cisplatin resistance genes. ANXA1 [ 29 ], AREG [ 29 ], DUSP1 [ 30 ], DUSP8 [ 31 ], EGR1 [ 32 ], HRAS [ 33 ], IL6 [ 34 ], ILK [ 31 ], MAFB [ 35 ], MFAP5 [ 36 ], MSLN [ 37 ], NR4A1 [ 38 ], PINK1 [ 39 ], PRKCDBP [ 40 ], PTGER3 [ 41 ], SNCA [ 42 ], STIM1 [ 43 ] and TGFBI [ 44 ] have all been proven to be associated with cisplatin resistance. Immune environment analyses proved the connection of miR-675-3p to immune cells, and our data also showed that high expression of miR-675-3p might be related to decreased sensitivity to cisplatin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%