2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.08.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minoxidil 1 mg oral versus minoxidil 5% topical solution for the treatment of female-pattern hair loss: A randomized clinical trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
86
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(4 reference statements)
3
86
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Individual patient data including sex, dose of OM received, presence of hypertrichosis and presence of lower limb edema were collected and synthesized in the pooled-analysis. These data were available for the studies of Pirmez et al, 4 Lueangarun et al, 5 Ramos et al, 6 Sinclair et al, 7 Beach et al 8 For studies that used more than one dose of OM, data of adverse effects for each dose and sex subgroups were obtained by contacting the authors (Jimenez-Cauhe et al, 9 Rodrigues-Barata et al, 10 and Wambier et al 11 Aggregated meta-analysis of therapeutic response rate to OM could not be performed because (a) different hair diseases were treated in each study; (b) studies used heterogeneous criteria for the assessment of therapeutic hair regrowth; and (c) a large number of patients did not receive OM in monotherapy.…”
Section: Data Synthesis and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual patient data including sex, dose of OM received, presence of hypertrichosis and presence of lower limb edema were collected and synthesized in the pooled-analysis. These data were available for the studies of Pirmez et al, 4 Lueangarun et al, 5 Ramos et al, 6 Sinclair et al, 7 Beach et al 8 For studies that used more than one dose of OM, data of adverse effects for each dose and sex subgroups were obtained by contacting the authors (Jimenez-Cauhe et al, 9 Rodrigues-Barata et al, 10 and Wambier et al 11 Aggregated meta-analysis of therapeutic response rate to OM could not be performed because (a) different hair diseases were treated in each study; (b) studies used heterogeneous criteria for the assessment of therapeutic hair regrowth; and (c) a large number of patients did not receive OM in monotherapy.…”
Section: Data Synthesis and Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have investigated the efficacy of low-dose oral minoxidil (0. effluvium, and monilethrix, with promising results shown including increased hair thickness in LPP. [65][66][67][68] Although no studies have been published to date on the efficacy of oral minoxidil for FFA, it is nevertheless a potential consideration for adjunctive therapy, particularly if the FFA is unmasking androgenetic alopecia. Future studies are needed to investigate the efficacy of oral minoxidil specifically for patients with FFA.…”
Section: Oral Minoxidilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, there is an increase in hair thickness at 24 weeks compared to the baseline T A B L E 2 Main trichoscopic results expressed in mean (SD) of the comparative effectiveness of oral minoxidil for 24 weeks in the frontal area and vertex area for the treatment of FPHL AGA in patients of both sexes. 1,2,6 In our study, the majority of premenopausal or postmenopausal patients with AGA who had been treated with OM at 1.5 to 2 mg/d for more than 24 weeks had achieved excellent results. In particular, there was a statistically significant improvement in the frontal area of the total average hair density per unit area and of the total number of hairs in a 0.903-cm 2 area at 24 weeks compared to the baseline.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%