Minority Governments, Deadlock Situations, and the Survival of Presidential Democracies

Abstract

What are the conditions that generate minority presidents, minority governments, and deadlock in presidential regimes? What is the impact of minority presidents, minority governments, and deadlock on the survival of these regimes? Based on data for all presidential democracies that existed between 1946 and 1996, the author shows (a) that characteristics of the electoral and party systems do affect the level of support for the president in congress and hence the probability of minority presidents and minority governments; (b) that these characteristics, and the minority governments they generate, do not make deadlock more likely; and (c) that minority presidents, minority governments, and deadlock do not affect the survival of presidential democracies. Together, these findings suggest that the view that explains the instability of presidential democracies in terms of the type of executive-legislative relations these regimes are likely to induce must be abandoned. The author offers two reasons, institutional in nature, that may account for the instability of presidential regimes.

Measuring Presidential Dominance over Cabinets in Presidential Systems: Constitutional Design and Power Sharing

“…According to Mainwaring (1993), in a system of government that is guided by non-cooperative incentives between the executive and legislative powers-a system which consequently offers no incentive for the formation of coalitions- and CASTIGLIONI, 2010;AMORIM NETO, 2006;CHASQUETTI, 2001;CHEIBUB, 2002;CHEIBUB, PRZEWORSKI and SAIEGH, 2004;DEHEZA, 1997;MEJÍA ACOSTA, 2009;NEGRETTO, 2006;ZELAZNIK, 2001). …”

Intraparty and Interparty Politics: Factions, Fractions, Parties, and Coalitions in Uruguay, 1985-1999

“…Many of these characteristics are determined by the electoral system, such as: control over nominations, district magnitudes, pooling of votes, internal competition, or entry barriers (see Chasquetti 2002, Cheibub 2002. It is clear that "without understanding recruitment procedures the study of legislative and executive institutions is incomplete, because we lack the whole picture of the incentives operating on elected officials" (Siavelis y Morgenstern 2004).…”

The Presidency and the Executive Branch in Latin America: What We Know and What We Need to Know

“…3 The presidential system of government, in turn, has also been singled out in the literature, mostly as the culprit behind the democratic instability experienced by Latin America throughout the twentieth century (Linz and Valenzuela 1994). While recent research on regime stability (Cheibub, 2002(Cheibub, , 2007 and coalition politics (Zelaznik, 2001;Amorim Neto, 2006;Chasquetti, 2008) has seriously disputed the indictment against presidentialism, an analysis of how the organization and resources of the presidency shape public policies as well as presidential and regime survival is still pending.…”