2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2012.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minor counterclockwise rotation of the Tatra Mountains (Central Western Carpathians) as derived from paleomagnetic results achieved in hematite-bearing Lower Triassic sandstones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The occurrence of contrasting kinematic indicators is consistent with heterogeneous strain produced by shortening and general northward thrusting of the block‐in‐matrix assemblage constituting the arcuate PKB, rather than large‐scale rotation of the Inner Carpathian plate which would be implied by a major, consistent strike‐slip motion along the strike of the mountain belt. It is worth noting that the arcuate shape of the PKB follows that of the whole Western Outer Carpathian belt, which has been documented by paleomagnetic studies [ Szaniawski et al ., ] as having suffered only moderate tectonic rotations (approximately 20°) around a vertical axis (therefore, it did not result by bending of a formerly rectilinear belt [ Grabowski , , ; Szaniawski et al ., ]). More to the south, variable—mostly counterclockwise—rotations have been documented by paleomagnetic analyses performed on the allochthonous nappes of the CWC basement [ Grabowski , ; Grabowski and Nemčok , ; Grabowski et al ., , ; Krs et al ., ; Kruczyk et al ., ].…”
Section: Balanced Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occurrence of contrasting kinematic indicators is consistent with heterogeneous strain produced by shortening and general northward thrusting of the block‐in‐matrix assemblage constituting the arcuate PKB, rather than large‐scale rotation of the Inner Carpathian plate which would be implied by a major, consistent strike‐slip motion along the strike of the mountain belt. It is worth noting that the arcuate shape of the PKB follows that of the whole Western Outer Carpathian belt, which has been documented by paleomagnetic studies [ Szaniawski et al ., ] as having suffered only moderate tectonic rotations (approximately 20°) around a vertical axis (therefore, it did not result by bending of a formerly rectilinear belt [ Grabowski , , ; Szaniawski et al ., ]). More to the south, variable—mostly counterclockwise—rotations have been documented by paleomagnetic analyses performed on the allochthonous nappes of the CWC basement [ Grabowski , ; Grabowski and Nemčok , ; Grabowski et al ., , ; Krs et al ., ; Kruczyk et al ., ].…”
Section: Balanced Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basal Triassic conglomerates that sit on the granites also dip 40° to the north [ Rubinkiewicz and Ludwiniak , ]. As the Mesozoic nappes form the basement of the CCPB the tilt might be related to the formation of the Podhale syncline in Neogene times [ Plašienka et al ., ; Szaniawski et al ., ] (Figure d). The structure of the core of the Tatry is not clear.…”
Section: Geological Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of uplift in the Tatra Mts is highest along the sub-Tatric fault causing tilting and exposure of the southern and south-eastern part of the Tatra block at first (Bac-Moszaszwili 1995; Anczkiewicz et al 2005;Králiková et al 2014). Tilting has a W-E oriented axis and since the Early Miocene the Tatra block has been rotated northward by varying amounts depending on the study; by 20° (Piotrowski 1978), by 30-35° (Bac-Moszaszwili 1995) or by 40° (Jurewicz 2005;Szaniawski et al 2012). Exhumation of the Tatra Mts split the Central Carpathian Pa- Roca et al (1995).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%