The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2003
DOI: 10.1080/03014223.2003.9518351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mink(Mustela vison)eradication to protect ground‐nesting birds in the Western Isles, Scotland, United Kingdom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, in a trial at Lake Waikaremoana, New Zealand, lures containing 1% stoat anal gland secretion increased the number of visits by stoats to footprint tracking tunnels (Clapperton et al 1999). Second, in an effort to eradicate mink (Mustela vison L.) from Scottish islands with ground-nesting birds, traps baited with scent glands removed from mink were 50% more effective than fish-baited traps (Moore et al 2003). Both these examples indicate the luring potential of anal gland scent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…First, in a trial at Lake Waikaremoana, New Zealand, lures containing 1% stoat anal gland secretion increased the number of visits by stoats to footprint tracking tunnels (Clapperton et al 1999). Second, in an effort to eradicate mink (Mustela vison L.) from Scottish islands with ground-nesting birds, traps baited with scent glands removed from mink were 50% more effective than fish-baited traps (Moore et al 2003). Both these examples indicate the luring potential of anal gland scent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Descriptions of the project can be found in Moore et al (2003) and Roy (2012). The control site in the Uists comprised approximately 356 islands and skerries totalling 850 km 2 .…”
Section: Methods and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are not aware of any studies that compare live trapping capture rates with lethal traps or of studies that compare non baited traps to food baited. One study that compared the use of scent gland lure had mixed results (Moore et al 2003). Predation rate on artifi cial nests needs to be interpreted with care (Moore and Robinson 2004) and pertinent to the nesting behaviour of grebe may underestimate the risk of predation during intensive nest feeding activity during the fi rst few days after hatching (Dillon et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distance between each trap was 1 km allowing multiple detection possibilities within active mink territories at each checking period (Gerell 1970, Birks and Linn 1982, Reynolds et al 2010. Stations were monitored every seven days to comply with the wildlife laws and to be a suffi cient time interval to both remove individuals from a treatment area and record activity in control areas (Moore et al 2003, Asakskogen 2010. Stations were active during two periods during the ice-free season, with deployment between 26 May and 2 June as soon as ice melt began, until 21 July, and from 4 August until onset of fi rst winter ice on October 20.…”
Section: Experiments 1 Mink Removal and Activity Assessment With Raftmentioning
confidence: 99%