Mining rich health data from Canadian physician claims: features and face validity

Abstract

BackgroundPhysician claims data are one of the largest sources of coded health information unique to Canada. There is skepticism from data users about the quality of this data. This study investigated features of diagnostic codes used in the Alberta physician claims database.MethodsAlberta physician claims from January 1 to March 31, 2011 are analyzed. Claims contain coded diagnoses using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision (ICD-9), procedures, physician specialty and service-fee type. Descriptive statistics examined the diversity and frequency of unique ICD-9 diagnostic codes used and the level of code extension (e.g. 3- or 4-digit coding).ResultsA total of 7,441,005 claims by 6,601 physicians were analyzed. The average number of claims per physician was 1,079, with ranges between 1,330 for family medicine, 690 for internal medicine, 722 for surgery, 516 for pediatrics and 409 for neurology. Family physicians used an average of 121 diagnostic codes, internal medicine physicians 32, surgery 36, pediatrics 46 and neurology 27. Overall, 43.5% of claims had a more detailed diagnosis (ICD code with >3 digits). Physicians on a fee-for-service plan submitted 1,184 claims and used 88 unique diagnosis codes on average compared to 438 claims and 44 unique diagnosis codes from physicians on an alternative payment plan (APP).ConclusionsFace validity of diagnosis coded in physician claims is substantially high and the features of diagnosis codes seem to reasonably reflect the clinical specialty. Physicians submit a diverse array of ICD 9 diagnostic codes and nearly half of the ICD-9 diagnostic codes examined were more detailed than required (i.e. ICD code with >3 digits). Finally, guidelines and policies should be explored to assess the submission of shadow billings for physicians on APPs.

Factors associated with mode of colorectal cancer detection and time to diagnosis: a population level study

“…These three population-based datasets are routinely used in Canada to conduct health services research. Validation studies have shown them to have excellent sensitivity and specificity for identifying colorectal-related procedures and have high face validity for diagnosis codes [14–16]. Health services related to CRC diagnosis were defined using both procedure and diagnosis codes.…”

Effect of physician specialist alternative payment plans on administrative health data in Calgary: a validation study

“…Of those who responded to the follow-up survey (n = 63), 44 (69.8%) were males and 19 (30.1%) were females. Respondents to this follow-up survey were from the following specialties: internal medicine (22, 35.0%), general surgery (18, 28.6%), neurology/neurosurgery (2, 3.0%), pediatrics (11,17.5%) and psychiatry (10, 15.9%). Of the 317 consenting physicians, 38.1% were reimbursed by fee for service, 14.1% by a partial alternative payment plan and 47.8% by full alternative payment plan.…”

“…A study evaluating physician claims data found high face validity; however, further validation work is still needed to assess provincial variation in the quality of these data. 17 We extracted all services provided by these physicians from Jan. 1, 2002, to Dec. 31, 2009. The linked records formed the denominator (i.e., standard reference; number of services provided by physicians).…”

How well do ICD-9 physician claim diagnostic codes identify confirmed pertussis cases in Alberta, Canada? A Canadian Immunization Research Network (CIRN) Study

“…Because of universal health care in Canada, a very large proportion of health care visits are captured in administrative settings such as physician claims [13]. In our jurisdiction ProvLab performs the majority of tests for many notifiable diseases and since 2004 performs all pertussis testing for the province.…”