2009 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design 2009
DOI: 10.1109/cscwd.2009.4968109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mining and analyzing organizational social networks for collaborative design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In analyzing the results obtained with this new algorithm we saw that the number of Unit Groups was reduced, i.e., the number of groups formed by only one researcher decreased considerably. In the previous work [25,30] we found ten Unit Groups and, when using the algorithm that analyzes the network flow in this work we found only two. Table 1 was built based on Figure 5 and shows group distribution within and amongst institutions.…”
Section: A Clustering Analysismentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In analyzing the results obtained with this new algorithm we saw that the number of Unit Groups was reduced, i.e., the number of groups formed by only one researcher decreased considerably. In the previous work [25,30] we found ten Unit Groups and, when using the algorithm that analyzes the network flow in this work we found only two. Table 1 was built based on Figure 5 and shows group distribution within and amongst institutions.…”
Section: A Clustering Analysismentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In previous studies [25,30] we used an algorithm to detect clusters using a minimum spanning tree. This method uses both the profile data and the information on relationships during the clustering process.…”
Section: A Relationships As Similarity Metricmentioning
confidence: 99%