2010
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2010.2081968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimizing Photodiode Nonlinearities by Compensating Voltage-Dependent Responsivity Effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We speculate that electron-phonon, electron-carrier, and/or electron-impurity collisions are disrupting the quantum coherence that is needed for the Franz-Keldysh effect to appear in the experimental devices. We note that the Franz-Keldysh effect has been observed to be important in some modern-day devices [11], [13].…”
Section: Franz-keldysh Effectmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We speculate that electron-phonon, electron-carrier, and/or electron-impurity collisions are disrupting the quantum coherence that is needed for the Franz-Keldysh effect to appear in the experimental devices. We note that the Franz-Keldysh effect has been observed to be important in some modern-day devices [11], [13].…”
Section: Franz-keldysh Effectmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The drop is only 0.05 V. However, we note that the load resistor becomes important when the current is large as is the case in some modern-day devices [11], [13].…”
Section: B External Loading and Thermionic Emissionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We see that the intercept points derived from these two techniques agree quite well; the 1-3 dB differences are readily attributed to measurement accuracy (the ESA amplitude accuracy is 1 dB for both systems). There are likely small wavelength-dependent variations in the measured nonlinearity as well [37]; however, this area warrants further research. This comparison illustrates that both techniques provide equivalent measurement fidelity for current photodiode structures.…”
Section: B Example Nonlinearity Measurementmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…typically varies slightly as a function of the operating conditions of the device. Nonlinearities resulting from both current-dependant [1] and voltage-dependant [8] responsivities have been presented in the literature, and some basic analysis in calculating nonlinearities from the voltagedependant responsivity has been suggested [2], but to the author's knowledge, no photodiode nonlinearity has been numerically quantified using responsivity measurements. In this work, we present a detailed mathematical model for photodiode distortion as a function of the current-dependant responsivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%