2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3044922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimization of Cogging Torque in Axial Field Flux Switching Machine Using Arc Shaped Triangular Magnets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 12/13 AFFSPM with an external dual rotor and middle dual-stator that has a higher torque density and a lower cogging torque is then suggested [12]. Additionally, a structure with an external dual rotor, an internal dual-stator, and an arc-shaped magnet reduces the cogging torque by about 61.8% [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 12/13 AFFSPM with an external dual rotor and middle dual-stator that has a higher torque density and a lower cogging torque is then suggested [12]. Additionally, a structure with an external dual rotor, an internal dual-stator, and an arc-shaped magnet reduces the cogging torque by about 61.8% [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, the combination of pole arc coefficient was studied. In the study [3], the axial flux permanent magnet machine (AFPMM) was proposed to design the slotted axial field flux switching for reducing the torque ripple. This paper also used the FEM to design, analyze and create the new model of machines.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the world of science, research, and education, the CT reduction method has been investigated and proposed, covering the dummy slot method in the stator core [4], dummy teeth in the stator core [5,6], magnet surface [7,8] or magnet edge slotting [9], magnet surface slotting [10], magnetic pole arc optimization [11][12][13], skewing magnet [14] or stator [15], magnet shifting [16,17] fractional slot number [15,18] and many more. Each technique developed for CT reduction retains its preferences and disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%