2021
DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2021.735645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimally Invasive Image-Guided Gut Transport Function Measurement Probe

Abstract: Introduction: Diseases such as celiac disease, environmental enteric dysfunction, infectious gastroenteritis, type II diabetes and inflammatory bowel disease are associated with increased gut permeability. Dual sugar absorption tests, such as the lactulose to rhamnose ratio (L:R) test, are the current standard for measuring gut permeability. Although easy to administer in adults, the L:R test has a number of drawbacks. These include an inability to assess for spatial heterogeneity in gut permeability that may … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Passively scanned M‐mode OCT probes were incorporated in intestinal potential difference (IPD) 31 and brush sampling devices that do not intrinsically employ image guidance. These probe‐coupled devices were introduced into the small intestine via a custom‐fabricated, guide tube termed a transnasal introduction tube (TNIT) 32 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Passively scanned M‐mode OCT probes were incorporated in intestinal potential difference (IPD) 31 and brush sampling devices that do not intrinsically employ image guidance. These probe‐coupled devices were introduced into the small intestine via a custom‐fabricated, guide tube termed a transnasal introduction tube (TNIT) 32 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IPD device, with an outer diameter (OD) of 1.2 mm and a length of 1.2 m (Figure 1A), 31 measures transepithelial voltage as a proxy of small intestinal permeability 33 . Since the IPD probe was introduced via the TNIT into the small intestine without the aid of a forward‐viewing white light endoscope and the probe requires mucosal contact to obtain accurate measurements, it was critical that the probe contained a contact‐sensing mechanism.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%