2015
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.13878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimal tumour burden in haematological diseases: a step forward with quantitative assessment of Bence‐Jones in nephelometry?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 It is also important during follow-up to evaluate a patient’s response to therapy and as supportive evidence for minimal tumor burden. 6 According to guidelines published in 2003, 5 the gold standard method for the identification and characterization of BJP is immunofixation electrophoresis of urinary proteins, since it both detects the presence of FLCs and determines if they are monoclonal or polyclonal. After electrophoresis, the BJP peak can be quantified by densitometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 It is also important during follow-up to evaluate a patient’s response to therapy and as supportive evidence for minimal tumor burden. 6 According to guidelines published in 2003, 5 the gold standard method for the identification and characterization of BJP is immunofixation electrophoresis of urinary proteins, since it both detects the presence of FLCs and determines if they are monoclonal or polyclonal. After electrophoresis, the BJP peak can be quantified by densitometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%