2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevapplied.11.014016
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimal Timing Jitter in Superconducting Nanowire Single-Photon Detectors

Abstract: Using two-temperature model coupled with modified time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau equation we calculate the delay time τ d in appearance of growing normal domain in the current-biased superconducting strip after absorption of the single photon. We demonstrate that τ d depends on the place in the strip where photon is absorbed and monotonically decreases with increasing of the current. We argue, that the variation of τ d (timing jitter), connected either with position-dependent response or Fano fluctuations coul… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(82 reference statements)
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) Dependence of the detection current on the position of the absorption site across the strip was theoretically studied in Refs. [7,10]. The difference between the maximum and the minimum of the local detection current within the strip width along with the dependence of the maximum detection current on the photon energy give an estimate of σ E ≈ 50 meV, which is much smaller than our experimental values of σ E ≈ 330 meV.…”
Section: Previously Discussed Broadening Mechanismscontrasting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(1) Dependence of the detection current on the position of the absorption site across the strip was theoretically studied in Refs. [7,10]. The difference between the maximum and the minimum of the local detection current within the strip width along with the dependence of the maximum detection current on the photon energy give an estimate of σ E ≈ 50 meV, which is much smaller than our experimental values of σ E ≈ 330 meV.…”
Section: Previously Discussed Broadening Mechanismscontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Such areas are defined by constrictions [18] and static local fluctuations in the strip thickness [11] or in the superconducting energy gap [19]. The barrier also depends on the position across the strip [7,10]. The presence of such fluctuation does not affect the statistics of dark counts but modifies their mean count rate.…”
Section: Fluctuation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An experimental study of the jitter associated with meandered [24] and straight [25] nanowires found asymmetry in the jitter profile which was attributed to intrinsic effects, and more recently, an increase in timing jitter was measured in straight NbN nanowires with increasing magnetic field [26] which was qualitatively explained by the hotspot model [15]. The same model is used to study the effects of transverse position dependence on timing jitter [27]. Experimental progress through the use of specialized short structures and low noise cryogenic amplifiers has enabled the measurement of record low timing jitter in niobium nitride (NbN) nanowires, as low as 2.7 ps FWHM [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard deviation (STD) or FWHM associated with the PDF are both the measure of the jitter. Timing jitter in superconducting nanowires has been actively investigated in a few past years both theoretically [3]- [7] and experimentally [8]- [13]. Many efforts have been implemented Artem Kuzmin, Steffen Doerner, Stefan Wuensch, Konstantin Ilin, Michael Siegel are with Institut für Mikro-und Nanoelektronische Systeme (IMS) , Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, 76187, Germany (email: artem.kuzmin@kit.edu).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%