2009
DOI: 10.3182/20090630-4-es-2003.00241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minimal Structurally Overdetermined sets for residual generation: A comparison of alternative approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In practice r(z) will never be zero because of process noise, but this can be overcome by thresholding the value using statistical tests [18]. Two different approaches for creating residual generators are the parity space approach [31] and the structural approach [14]. For both these approaches different subsets of the equations in the system model are transformed to make the residual generators.…”
Section: Fault Detection and Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In practice r(z) will never be zero because of process noise, but this can be overcome by thresholding the value using statistical tests [18]. Two different approaches for creating residual generators are the parity space approach [31] and the structural approach [14]. For both these approaches different subsets of the equations in the system model are transformed to make the residual generators.…”
Section: Fault Detection and Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible to have system models where faulty behavior is modeled explicitly [38,88]. The consistency-based diagnosis approach can also be combined with the FDI approach by creating residual generators such that each non-zero residual maps to a conflict set [14,33]. Consistency-based methods can then be used to compute consistent diagnoses.…”
Section: Consistency-based Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on this graph a Dulmage-Mendelsohn decomposition (Dulmage and Mendelsohn, 1958) gives information about what part of the model that has analytical redundancy, and thereby can be monitored. There are several efficient tools available to find subsets of the model with analytical redundancy, and some of these are discussed and compared in Armengol et al (2009).…”
Section: Structural Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on this graph a Dulmage-Mendelsohn decomposition (Dulmage and Mendelsohn, 1958) gives information about what part of the model that is overdetermined and thereby can be monitored. There are several efficient tools available to find subsets of the model with analytical redundancy, and some of these are discussed and compared in Armengol et al (2009). Overdetermined sets are of special interest since they are used to construct residuals, and are denoted e.g.…”
Section: Structural Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%