1945
DOI: 10.1021/j150440a003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Minima in Surface-tension and Interfacial-tension Curves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1952
1952
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The surface activity parameter a L of C 8 EO 4 is distinctly lower than that of C 8 EO 3 . This means that the former possesses a higher surface activity.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Aspirated Materialsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The surface activity parameter a L of C 8 EO 4 is distinctly lower than that of C 8 EO 3 . This means that the former possesses a higher surface activity.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Aspirated Materialsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…[2] at lower bulk concentrations (not shown in Fig. 2) and by the equations of Langmuir/Szyszkowski [3,4] at higher concentrations. The transitional interval at intermediate concentrations is described by a polynomial,…”
Section: Surface Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because of the small minimum found for cis-1, the sample was purified further by two recrystallizations and using the foam purification method. 34 The minimum could not be reduced even after 24 h foaming, which likely suggests that its origin is not due to the presence of hydrophobic impurities. The break corresponds to the cmc that was determined as the intersection of two fitting straight lines in the plot of γ versus log c. From the slope just before the break, the minimum area per molecule (A m ) was calculated according to the Gibbs adsorption isotherm using 2 as the number of adsorbing species (see the Experimental Section).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%