1984
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19841101)54:9<1814::aid-cncr2820540909>3.0.co;2-v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mineral dusts in lungs with scar or scar cancer

Abstract: Five lungs with small scars and five lungs with small scar associated cancers, were studied by light and scanning electron microscopy and x‐ray energy dispersive spectrometry. Six hundred particles were photographed and their physical and chemical properties analyzed from scar, cancer, or normal alveolar tissue on carbon planchet‐mounted, deparaffinized and low temperature‐ashed sections. Amosite/crocidolite fibers were accumulated only in one cancerous lung. All other lungs shared similar types of mineral par… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By using clinical data (tissue pathology/histology), which are obtained long after the events leading to the scar or cancer formation have occurred, it is often difficult to sort out any definitive time sequence between the initiation of the processes resulting in scar formation and the subsequent development of the tumor. In spite of these limitations, in some reports there is evidence that the scar (and scarring process) predates the tumor, [6][7][8][9][10][11] in others it is impossible to tell, 12,13 and in others there is evidence that there was an active scarring process as a result of the tumor. 2,3,5,[14][15][16] The basic assumption behind any conclusions of no association between a pulmonary scar and its "associated" tumor [1][2][3][4][5] is that the scar itself cannot have directly caused the tumor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By using clinical data (tissue pathology/histology), which are obtained long after the events leading to the scar or cancer formation have occurred, it is often difficult to sort out any definitive time sequence between the initiation of the processes resulting in scar formation and the subsequent development of the tumor. In spite of these limitations, in some reports there is evidence that the scar (and scarring process) predates the tumor, [6][7][8][9][10][11] in others it is impossible to tell, 12,13 and in others there is evidence that there was an active scarring process as a result of the tumor. 2,3,5,[14][15][16] The basic assumption behind any conclusions of no association between a pulmonary scar and its "associated" tumor [1][2][3][4][5] is that the scar itself cannot have directly caused the tumor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In more general terms, it may be no coincidence that either a variety of pulmonary infections or mineral deposits in the lungs were regarded as the most likely damaging agents leading to inflammation and scar formation in those reports that had evidence that scar formation predated the lung cancers. [6][7][8][9]11 Inflammatory processes in response to those agents (leading to scarring) could very likely have been one of the predominant mechanistic causes of the lung cancers as well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation