2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.08.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mindlin second-gradient elastic properties from dilute two-phase Cauchy-elastic composites. Part I: Closed form expression for the effective higher-order constitutive tensor

Abstract: It is shown that second-order homogenization of a Cauchy-elastic dilute suspension of randomly distributed inclusions yields an equivalent second gradient (Mindlin) elastic material. This result is valid for both plane and three-dimensional problems and extends earlier findings by Bigoni and Drugan (Analytical derivation of Cosserat moduli via homogenization of heterogeneous elastic materials. J. Appl. Mech., 2007, 74, 741-753) from several points of view: (i.) the result holds for anisotropic phases with sph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The need for such generalized continuum models has also been verified through experimental (Lakes et al, 1985;Beveridge et al, 2013) and theoretical (Smishlayev and Fleck, 1995;Bigoni and Drugan, 2007;Bacca et al, 2013a;2013b;Bacigalupo, 2013) approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The need for such generalized continuum models has also been verified through experimental (Lakes et al, 1985;Beveridge et al, 2013) and theoretical (Smishlayev and Fleck, 1995;Bigoni and Drugan, 2007;Bacca et al, 2013a;2013b;Bacigalupo, 2013) approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The key for the identification procedure performed in the next Section is the imposition to the infinite lattice of a linear and a quadratic nodal displacement fields (as in [3], [4], [7], [10]), together with an 'additional field' ∆u (m,n|i) , namely,…”
Section: Second-order Displacement Boundary Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, from Eq. (18), the elastic energy of the lattice can be expressed as U (m,n) lat (a, b * ) and therefore can be represented as the following quadratic form in a and b * U (m,n) lat (a, b * ) = 2 a · H [1] k, k, k a + 2 a · mH [2] k, k, k + nH [3] k, k, k + H [4] k, k, k b * + 2 b * · m 2 H [5] k, k, k + n 2 H [6] k, k, k + m nH [7] k, k, k + mH [8] k, k, k + +nH [9] k, k, k + H [10]…”
Section: Energy Stored Within the Lattice Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Homogenization techniques can be roughly classified into a total of three major groups according to the method at the base of their development. In particular, a first group of asymptotic based methods or using an asymptotic approximation of the strain energy (Bacigalupo; [22] Bakhvalov and Panasenko; [23] Bensoussan et al [24] ), a second group of variational-asymptotic techniques (Bacigalupo and Gambarotta; [25,26] Peerlings and Fleck; [27] Smyshlyaev and Cherednichenko [28] ), and a third group of computational homogenization techniques can be discerned (Addessi et al; [29] Bacca et al; [30] Bacigalupo and Gambarotta; [31] Bigoni and Drugan; [32] Forest and Trinh; [33] Miehe et al; [35] Kouznetsova et al [36] ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%