2020
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17134842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mind over Matter: Testing the Efficacy of an Online Randomized Controlled Trial to Reduce Distraction from Smartphone Use

Abstract: Evidence suggests a growing call for the prevention of excessive smartphone and social media use and the ensuing distraction that arises affecting academic achievement and productivity. A ten-day online randomized controlled trial with the use of smartphone apps, engaging participants in mindfulness exercises, self-monitoring and mood tracking, was implemented amongst UK university students (n = 143). Participants were asked to complete online pre- and post-intervention assessments. Results indicated h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
1
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 240 publications
0
68
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Deficient Self-Regulation Measure (DSR) (178) is a 7item scale assessing poor self-regulation in video game playing adapted for smartphone use (40) and unregulated internet use (179). This measure has been shown to exhibit sound psychometric properties (178), with sample items in the scale adapted for smartphone use including "I get strong urges to use social media" and "I feel my social media use is out of control."…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The Deficient Self-Regulation Measure (DSR) (178) is a 7item scale assessing poor self-regulation in video game playing adapted for smartphone use (40) and unregulated internet use (179). This measure has been shown to exhibit sound psychometric properties (178), with sample items in the scale adapted for smartphone use including "I get strong urges to use social media" and "I feel my social media use is out of control."…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, the rationale for the development of this scale was based on the premise that distractive smartphone use appears to be driven primarily by the cognitive preoccupation with social media content in order to attend to needs for validation and control (of content, self-presentation, and relationships). This preoccupation and urge to check ( 90 ) or interact, in turn, prompts emotional reactivity and behavioral activation in the form of distraction ( 40 , 91 ), amplified by FOMO and the need to control self-presentation and others' perceptions or seek reassurance ( 92 ). This process could also be experienced from non-social use ( 73 , 93 ) because smartphones are multi-purpose devices and recent studies suggest that process use (e.g., watching videos, browsing online) is widespread as much as social use ( 73 ) and with stronger associations with problematic smartphone use ( 92 , 94 ).…”
Section: Smartphone Distraction and Relevant Psychological Constructsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The novelty is these studies is the inclusion of more contextual or environmental factors related to these technological use problems [ 31 , 34 ] and sometimes were treated as predictive ones (i.e., Relational-predictive studies) using predictive aims through statistical techniques to for example extract the factors which seems to cause an outcome (20% of the papers). Only a few studies have real independent variables manipulated by the researchers to cause an effect in other dependent ones, such as new health and educational interventions studied (e.g., Solution-Focused Group Counselling Intervention [ 25 ], an app based on cognitive-behavioural principles to avoid smartphone distractions [ 15 ]). This means applied research in the field is starting to look for explanations outside the intra-individual sphere through more controlled research designs, through new clinical and educational interventions to promote preventive strategies to minimize harms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%