2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-020-02306-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MINARO HD: control and evaluation of a handheld, highly dynamic surgical robot

Abstract: Purpose Current surgical robotic systems are either large serial arms, resulting in higher risks due to their high inertia and no inherent limitations of the working space, or they are bone-mounted, adding substantial additional task steps to the surgical workflow. The robot presented in this paper has a handy and lightweight design and can be easily held by the surgeon. No rigid fixation to the bone or a cart is necessary. A high-speed tracking camera together with a fast control system ensures… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With generated ideal user inputs at the master side, mean tracked position error of the minaroHD on the slave side were below 0.12 mm for milling in low-density material ( =240 kg/m 3 ) and 0.28 for milling high-density material ( =1200 kg/m 3 ). Observed tracked position errors at different feed rates are comparable to the motion compensation accuracy reported by Vossel et al [ 13 ]. This indicates that, compared to the control error, milling forces have no apparent effect on the position error for the presented test-setup and the investigated range of milling parameters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With generated ideal user inputs at the master side, mean tracked position error of the minaroHD on the slave side were below 0.12 mm for milling in low-density material ( =240 kg/m 3 ) and 0.28 for milling high-density material ( =1200 kg/m 3 ). Observed tracked position errors at different feed rates are comparable to the motion compensation accuracy reported by Vossel et al [ 13 ]. This indicates that, compared to the control error, milling forces have no apparent effect on the position error for the presented test-setup and the investigated range of milling parameters.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Ideal master-side user inputs without path deviations were generated and sent via a TCP/IP connection to the robot controller on the slave side. An Anspach handpiece (JNJ, New Brunswick, NJ, USA) with a 4 mm ball burr was mounted on the minaroHD miniature robot [ 13 ] and calibrated with an optically tracked calibration plate. For milling, low-density blocks made of SikaBlock M330 (Sika Deutschland GmbH, Bad Urach, Germany) and high-density blocks made of Obomodulan 1200 sahara (OBO-Werke GmbH, Stadthagen, Germany) were used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A new version of the MINARO HD system (Vossel et al, 2021) with three degrees of freedom is used for these experiments, with a standard high-speed burr (Anspach eG1 High Speed Electric System, DePuy Synthes, Raynham, MA, U.S.) attached as end effector. A passive array is mounted next to the burr adapter for optical tracking with the fusionTrack500 tracking camera (Atracsys LLC, Puidoux, Switzerland).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct tool tracking has the advantage that kinematic inaccuracies or robot elasticities can be corrected based on real time robot motion control. Apart from the accuracy of real-time motion compensation based on optical tracking (Vossel et al, 2021), the accuracy of the virtual fixtures highly depends on image acquisition, planning and registration as well as tool calibration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%