No abstract

Purpose A frequently mentioned lack of teleoperated surgical robots is the lack of haptic feedback. Haptics are not only able to mirror force information from the situs, but also to provide spatial guidance according to a surgical plan. However, superposition of the two haptic information can lead to overlapping and masking of the feedback and guidance forces. This study investigates different approaches toward a combination of both information and investigates effects on system usability. Methods Preliminary studies are conducted to define parameters for two main experiments. The two main experiments constitute simulated surgical interventions where haptic guidance as well as haptic feedback provide information for the surgeon. The first main experiment considers drilling for pedicle screw placements, while the second main experiment refers to three-dimensional milling tasks such as during partial knee replacements or craniectomies. For both experiments, different guidance modes in combination with haptic feedback are evaluated regarding effectiveness (e.g., distance to target depth), efficiency and user satisfaction (e.g., detectability of discrepancies in case of technical guidance error). Results Regarding pedicle screw placements a combination of a peripheral visual signal and a vibration constitutes a good compromise regarding distance to target depth and detectability of discrepancies. For milling tasks, trajectory guidance is able to improve efficiency and user satisfaction (e.g., perceived workload), while boundary constraints improve effectiveness. If, assistance cannot be offered in all degrees of freedom (e.g., craniectomies), a visual substitution of the haptic force feedback shows the best results, though participants prefer using haptic force feedback. Conclusion Our results suggest that in case haptic feedback and haptic assistance are combined appropriately, benefits of both haptic modalities can be exploited. Thereby, capabilities of the human-machine system are improved compared to usage of exclusively one of the haptic information.Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

No abstract

No abstract

Purpose Cooperative surgical systems enable humans and machines to combine their individual strengths and collaborate to improve the surgical outcome. Cooperative telemanipulated systems offer the widest spectrum of cooperative functionalities, because motion scaling is possible. Haptic guidance can be used to assist surgeons and haptic feedback makes acting forces at the slave side transparent to the operator, however, overlapping and masking of forces needs to be avoided. This study evaluates the usability of a cooperative surgical telemanipulator in a laboratory setting. Methods Three experiments were designed and conducted for characteristic surgical task scenarios derived from field studies in orthopedics and neurosurgery to address bone tissue differentiation, guided milling and depth sensitive milling. Interaction modes were designed to ensure that no overlapping or masking of haptic guidance and haptic feedback occurs when allocating information to the haptic channel. Twenty participants were recruited to compare teleoperated modes, direct manual execution and an exemplary automated milling with respect to usability. Results Participants were able to differentiate compact and cancellous bone, both directly manually and teleoperatively. Both telemanipulated modes increased effectiveness measured by the mean absolute depth and contour error for guided and depth sensitive millings. Efficiency is decreased if solely a boundary constraint is used in hard material, while a trajectory guidance and manual milling perform similarly. With respect to subjective user satisfaction trajectory guidance is rated best for guided millings followed by boundary constraints and the direct manual interaction. Haptic feedback only improved subjective user satisfaction. Conclusion A cooperative surgical telemanipulator can improve effectiveness and efficiency close to an automated execution and enhance user satisfaction compared to direct manual interaction. At the same time, the surgeon remains part of the control loop and is able to adjust the surgical plan according to the intraoperative situation and his/her expertise at any time.