Evolutionary Biology 1978
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-6956-5_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mimicry in Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
161
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(170 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
161
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These effects, in turn, may impose strong selective pressures that potentially generate reciprocal evolutionary interactions. A better understanding of how mimicry affects the partners in a system may therefore reveal important information about evolutionary interactions (Wiens 1978;Gilbert 1983;Stowe 1988). In this regard, although most of what is known about mimicry has resulted from work done on animal systems, mimicry in plants also has much to contribute (Roy & Widmer 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These effects, in turn, may impose strong selective pressures that potentially generate reciprocal evolutionary interactions. A better understanding of how mimicry affects the partners in a system may therefore reveal important information about evolutionary interactions (Wiens 1978;Gilbert 1983;Stowe 1988). In this regard, although most of what is known about mimicry has resulted from work done on animal systems, mimicry in plants also has much to contribute (Roy & Widmer 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these systems, the female of the pollinator species usually acts as the model, with the orchids' intended target, the male, acting as the operator (Wiens 1978). The orchids' sexual masquerade often is achieved through a combination of chemical, visual and tactile cues (Dafni 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He hypothesised that the marks repelled the beetles. In his review of plant mimicry worldwide, Wiens (1978) The behaviour of the hopliinid Heterochelus sexlinea tus was observed on a large ( > 5 0 0 individuals) popula tion of Arctotheca calendula growing wild in an arboretum at Saasveld, near George in the southern Cape.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 The common classic explanations for light coloration of such plants were that it protects them from sun irradiation (including UV), 8 and that the glued sand defends them from abrasion by sand particles moving in strong wind, and by camouflage from herbivores. 9 Lev-Yadun 7 concluded that light-colored plant surfaces have several additional functions: (1) they can undermine the camouflage of herbivorous insects of other colors and expose them to predation, (2) since dust is a strong insect repellent and is lethal to insects, attached soil particles (especially clays) may defend plants with sticky glandular trichomes from insect herbivory, (3) the attached sand may defend from herbivory by mammals and arthropods by causing teeth or mouth part wear as do phytoliths (silica bodies) of grasses, and (4) white coloration of leaves and branches may mimic fungal infestation to reduce herbivory. Lev-Yadun 7 also proposed that since many desert animals tend to be paler than other members of the same taxa that inhabit wetter environments, according to Gloger's rule, 4 the abovementioned light-colored plant species are a good indication that Gloger's rule applies to plants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%